Hi,
I'm in favour of publishing this document.
I'm wondering which of the two relevant guidelines for Experimental
status in http://www.ietf.org/iesg/informational-vs-experimental.html
applies in this case.
Looking at the writeup in the tracker:
"This document presents a working example of the v4/v6 Stateless translation in
an operational network, which provides useful information for the interested
community."
I seem to see a much closer match to guidelines 2 or 3, which lead to
Informational.
Regards
Brian Carpenter
On 2009-12-05 03:43, The IESG wrote:
The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to consider
the following document:
- 'The CERNET IVI Translation Design and Deployment for the IPv4/IPv6
Coexistence and Transition '
<draft-xli-behave-ivi-05.txt> as an Experimental RFC
The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org mailing lists by 2010-01-01. Exceptionally,
comments may be sent to iesg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org instead. In either case,
please
retain the beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
The file can be obtained via
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-xli-behave-ivi-05.txt
IESG discussion can be tracked via
https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=view_id&dTag=17439&rfc_flag=0
_______________________________________________
IETF-Announce mailing list
IETF-Announce(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf