Re: Review of draft-ietf-pce-monitoring-04.txt

On 2009-12-16, at 10:55, JP Vasseur wrote:
> Yes you are right, that rings a bell. That said, I think that with the  
> added text, this should be clear now.
So if we changed it to "overload" in the earlier documents, wouldn't it make 
sense to make the same change here for consistency?

Lars

smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf