Alexey Melnikov wrote:
Hi Bernie,
Bernie Hoeneisen wrote:
[...]
Please be informed that on the provreg mailing list
http://www.cafax.se/ietf-provreg/maillist/2010-01/maillist.html
there is a heavy discussion going on about the shortcomings of the
current proposal. At least two issues have been identified so far:
1) XML namespace (interoperability issues as with the current proposal
the feature negotiation does not work anymore as defined by the EPP
core spec)
2) need for active / inactive flag (e.g. to mark a DS to be used for
emergency key rollover)
Before these (and other) issues have been resolved, IMHO it does not
make sense to discuss the I-D on the IESG Telechat.
I've just checked my inbox and the editor already sent me a message
about these issues.
The current proposal is still premature.
Ok, I will make sure the issues are resolved before the document goes
to IESG.
I also forgot to mention that I actually expect a new revision anyway -
there are some pending changes due to my AD review.
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf