This is an update of my review of draft-ietf-ccamp-pc-spc-rsvpte-ext-06, based
on the newly released version 07.
Updated Summary: Ready for publication. (I said draft standard the first
time-but this is intended as a proposed standard, right?)
Major Issues: None
Minor Issues: None
Nits/editorial comments:
-- Abstract, first paragraph, first sentence:
I can't parse first part of sentence. Should "… connections are controlled …"
be "…connections controlled…"?
No change--I still can't parse the first part of the sentence. Maybe the phrase
"may independently exist" is the problem?
-- 2nd paragraph:
I don't see any mention of PathTear in 4.2.1.1.
I think I meant to say the first paragraph, not the second. But I still don't
see the term "PathTear" mentioned in 4.2.1.1.
-- section 7.1:
Is this intended to recommend IANA choose 25?
No change. You say the bit number is (TBD by IANA) (25). Is the 25 a
recommendation? (in which case, "(TBD by IANA, 25 preferred)" would be helpful.
-- section 7.2:
Do you mean to recommend a code of 35?
No change--same as above.
Thanks!
Ben.
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf