3.4.1 says
"The data plane behaviour of MPLS-TP is the same as the best current
practise for MPLS. This includes the setting of the S-Bit. "
Without a reference, or any detail, I think this can only muddy the waters. How
do I know that your best practice is my best practice, or his?
Tom Petch
----- Original Message -----
From: "The IESG" <iesg-secretary(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org>
To: "IETF-Announce" <ietf-announce(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org>
Cc: <mpls(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org>
Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2010 4:33 PM
Subject: [mpls] Last Call: draft-ietf-mpls-tp-framework (A Framework forMPLS in
Transport Networks) to Informational RFC
The IESG has received a request from the Multiprotocol Label Switching WG
(mpls) to consider the following document:
- 'A Framework for MPLS in Transport Networks '
<draft-ietf-mpls-tp-framework-11.txt> as an Informational RFC
The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org mailing lists by 2010-04-21. Exceptionally,
comments may be sent to iesg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org instead. In either case,
please
retain the beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
The file can be obtained via
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-mpls-tp-framework-11.txt
IESG discussion can be tracked via
https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=view_id&dTag=18027&rf
c_flag=0
_______________________________________________
mpls mailing list
mpls(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf