ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Proposed IAOC Administrative Procedures

2010-06-11 12:16:40
It might be useful to distinguish between a conflict of interest and
an adverse interest.

For example, IAOC members are routinely going to have conflicting
duties of confidentiality. If someone claims to have a patent on HTTP
and I am acting as a forensic expert engaged by the defense, I am
going to have certain conflicts and there are going to be discussions
I cannot participate in. But that would be a rather different case
than being engaged by the plaintiff which would be a rather adverse
interest.



On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 11:08 AM, Dave CROCKER <dhc2(_at_)dcrocker(_dot_)net> 
wrote:



9.      Members shall at all times act in a disinterested manner and
consider only the benefit to the IETF standards process and community as
a
whole in discussions and decisions. The Members shall promptly disclose
any
material conflict of interest and recuse themselves from related
decisions.

While I grok what you mean by "act in a disinterested manner" it sounds a
bit if you'd like them to cultivate ennui.  Perhaps "In the discharge of
their duties, member shall at all times act only in the interests of the
IETF community. Members shall promptly disclose any material conflict of
interest, and they will recuse themselves from decisions where such
conflict
is present."


Kudos to the IAOC for developing this draft.

There are two different issues this segment of text ought to cover:

  *  independence
  *  confidentiality

"Conflict of interest" might be taken to cover both, but probably is assumed
by
most folk to cover only the first. Worse, the term is quite generic and an
average person will not have the background to treat it as a formal term of
art.
That is, they will not know how to apply it to the actual details of their
work.  It's simply not a behaviorally precise term for most people.

That said, it's a familiar term.  So I suggest keeping the term, but
explicitly
listing both independence and confidentiality as issues, and also listing
the
typical groups that are meant to be excluded from influence and information.
These are: employers, colleagues, friends and family.  Feel free to expand
the list...

d/
--

 Dave Crocker
 Brandenburg InternetWorking
 bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf




-- 
Website: http://hallambaker.com/
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: Proposed IAOC Administrative Procedures, Phillip Hallam-Baker <=