ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TLS] Second Last Call: draft-ietf-tls-rfc4366-bis (Transport Layer Security (TLS) Extensions: Extension Definitions) to Proposed Standard

2010-07-09 13:40:57
At 10:21 AM -0700 7/9/10, The IESG wrote:
The IESG has received a request from the Transport Layer Security WG
(tls) to consider the following document:

- 'Transport Layer Security (TLS) Extensions: Extension Definitions '
  <draft-ietf-tls-rfc4366-bis-09.txt> as a Proposed Standard

The purpose of this Second IETF Last Call is to confirm some changes
made as a result of the first IETF Last Call and subsequent
discussions.  The main issue was handling of the Server name
indications: dealing with multiple names and dealing with session
resumption.  Also a discussion in the security considerations on
why SHA-1 is acceptable for extensions that use it.

I support the new wording for both.

--Paul Hoffman, Director
--VPN Consortium
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: [TLS] Second Last Call: draft-ietf-tls-rfc4366-bis (Transport Layer Security (TLS) Extensions: Extension Definitions) to Proposed Standard, Paul Hoffman <=