Hi Sam,
Thanks for your review.
On Jul 14, 2010, at 4:55 AM, Sam Hartman wrote:
This is a secdir review of the above draft.
The text looks fine. However, I'm concerned that this specification
does
not provide sufficient detail for interoperable implementation. It
makes it clear that a GKMS needs to allocate SIDs but does not cite
any
mechanism for a GKMS to do so.
I think you need to either add a normative reference to a hopefully
already existing description of how to distribute this parameter, or
recast this document as an informational document describing a general
method but not implementing a protocol.
There is an I-D for one GKMS (draft-ietf-msec-gdoi-update-06) that
includes support for SIDs which could be referenced. It is expected to
head to WGLC soon. Would citing that document address your concern?
Thanks,
Brian
_______________________________________________
secdir mailing list
secdir(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir
--
Brian Weis
Security Standards and Technology, ARTG, Cisco Systems
Telephone: +1 408 526 4796
Email: bew(_at_)cisco(_dot_)com
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf