At 14:56 20-08-10, The IESG wrote:
The IESG has received a request from the Operational Security
Capabilities for IP Network Infrastructure WG (opsec) to consider the
following document:
- 'Cryptographic Authentication Algorithm Implementation Best Practices
for Routing Protocols'
<draft-ietf-opsec-igp-crypto-requirements-00.txt> as an Informational
RFC
The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
If it was the view of the opsec WG that this document represents best
practices, it could have chosen an intended status of BCP instead of
Informational. Quoting Section 8:
"We expect that new revisions of this document will be issued
in the future to reflect current thinking on best practice
in this area."
Does this document reflect best practice in this area?
As a nit, there are two occurrences of the RFC2119 boilerplate.
Regards,
-sm
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf