ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: The Evils of Informational RFC's

2010-09-09 14:34:10


On 9/8/2010 3:12 PM, Richard Bennett wrote:
It seems to me that one of the issues here is that architecture models
are published as Informational when they're clearly not in the same
level of authority as most Informational RFCs. An architecture document
is meant to guide future work on standards track RFCs, and has been
regarded historically as more or less binding.

"...guide future work on standards track RFCs" -- yes.

"...historically as more or less binding" -- no.

Bob Braden
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf