On Oct 14, 2010, at 12:19 PM, Ted Hardie wrote:
On the general clarity, I also have to say that I believe that the document
tipped over the "diff" line somewhere. That is, as a set of edits it is now
sufficiently complex that it would almost certainly be better to apply
the edits and re-spin the whole document rather than provide a set of
textual diffs in the current format. If the ADs and WG chairs feel that there
is no energy to tackle such a major editorial change, however, I certainly
understand. It is possible to build up the correct state with the two
documents;
it is just more difficult.
Hi Ted,
Do I understand correctly that you mean a respin of RFC 4975?
Thanks!
Ben.
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf