Glen Zorn [mailto://gwz(_at_)net-zen(_dot_)net] writes:
...
My apologies, I was mistakingly believing that the previous
discussions
on this topic had lead to the adoption of Route-Record AVPs in
answers.
I'm not at all sure that you were mistaken about that, but no such
decision
has been reflected in the draft.
Sorry, I should have been more specific: what I _meant_ was "reflected in
RFC3588bis".
..
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf