ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: draft-iab-dns-applications - clarification re: Send-N

2010-10-20 14:43:56


while I agree that the hierarchical and distributed nature of the DNS is
a scintillating, shimmering attractant, it is wise to be aware of the baseline
assumption in your arguement, e.g. that a client will -ALWAYS- ask an 
authoritative
source... 

The DNS is so designed that caching is a huge component of the scalability of
the DNS... and its greatest hinderance for such ideas as are laid out in the 
ENUM
dip lookup.    You can't be assured that the data is timely.  This is a strong 
reason 
to consider that the DNS is _NOT_ the droid you are looking for,  in spite of 
its other
attractive qualities.

just my 0.02 lira.

--bill



On 20October2010Wednesday, at 12:25, Richard Shockey wrote:


And finally, regarding:

"It is unclear why this data is better maintained by the DNS
than in an unrelated application protocol."

If a device is performing an ENUM dip hoping to find a contactable SIP URI,
it is simply most efficient for the ENUM response to directly include the
Send-N metadata when needed rather than have separate queries using a
different network protocol.  Also, the hierarchical and distributed nature
of the DNS protocol makes it an _ideal_ structural fit for this meta data.

I believe the onus should be on your draft to explicitly identify valid
technical reasons why the DNS protocol should _not_ be used, rather than
make vague hand-waving assertions which appear to have little or no
justification.



RS> Precisely, What is unclear is why the IETF and the IAB is suddenly
trying to block a perfectly legitimate extension of RFC 3761 that is in
various forms of global deployment, proven to work, scale and more
importantly provides a valuable and essential function in the transition
from analog POTS to SIP based communication.  

Just saying no is not a solution to the real issues of number translation in
carrier networks.

Ok a lot of people hate phone numbers including, it seems, 50% of RAI
directorate but they are not going away anytime soon. 

So just say it .. is this the message? Don't even try to charter E2MD? 

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf