Like others that have chimed in, I'm just concerned that it will be
difficult to attend multiple BOFs of interest if they're all scheduled
against each other.
Cheers,
Andy
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 12:47 PM, David Harrington
<ietfdbh(_at_)comcast(_dot_)net> wrote:
Hi,
part of the justification is to have the BOF early in the week so
people can discuss it during the week.
dbh
-----Original Message-----
From: iesg-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
[mailto:iesg-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org] On
Behalf Of Richard L. Barnes
Sent: Monday, November 08, 2010 10:29 AM
To: ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
Cc: wgchairs(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org; The IESG
Subject: Re: Proposed WG and BOF Scheduling Experiment
If we put the BOFs on Friday afternoon instead, wouldn't that
make the
attendance numbers an even stronger gauge of interest?
On 11/8/10 10:26 AM, The IESG wrote:
The IESG is seriously considering a WG and BOF scheduling
experiment. The
goal of the experiment is to provide WG agenda sooner and
also provide
more time to craft BOF proposals.
The proposed experiment includes three parts. First,
schedule all BOFs
for Monday afternoon. Second, schedule WGs before we know
which BOFs will
be held. Finally, provide an additional four weeks to deliver BOF
proposal to ADs.
Please let us know whether you support this experiment.
Discussion is
welcome on the mail list and the plenary on Wednesday evening.
On behalf of the IESG,
Russ Housley
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf