ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Two step, three step, one step, and alternatives

2010-11-13 01:45:26


On 11/13/10 12:01 AM, John C Klensin wrote:
For protocol specs, our normal way to sort of competing and
variant proposals is to form a WG.  We know that doesn't work
well for procedural documents.

Partially as an experiment, would you consider creating a
separate list, pointing the discussion there, and appointing a
rapporteur or two with responsibility for figuring out when
discussions have stabilized and then coming back to the IETF
list with a summary of that stability point, tradeoffs, etc.?

Call it what you will, this sounds like NEWTRK revisited.  What will be
different?
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf