Dave,
I think you will find that our NOC people have a great deal of
experience and perhaps even a list of do's and don'ts for this type of
design. In the end, this technology will not scale without bonds if
we're talking about n-thousand people sitting in a plenary hall, but
there are obviously a lot that can be done with a distribution of
multiple lower-powered (configured as such) units that don't use
overlapping channels, use of various 802.11 flavors (a, n, etc) and
more SSIDs, all in the name of load sharing.
While there may not be a document, and I agree that it would be useful
to have one, there is certainly a collective body of knowledge on this
topic (including a "never again use base stations from xxxx..").
Ole
Ole J. Jacobsen
Editor and Publisher, The Internet Protocol Journal
Cisco Systems
Tel: +1 408-527-8972 Mobile: +1 415-370-4628
E-mail: ole(_at_)cisco(_dot_)com URL: http://www.cisco.com/ipj
On Wed, 29 Dec 2010, Dave CROCKER wrote:
Time for a BCP?
<http://www.nytimes.com/2010/12/29/technology/29wifi.html?_r=1&nl=todaysheadlines&emc=tha25>
The problem is that Wi-Fi was never intended for large halls and
thousands of people, many of them bristling with an arsenal of
laptops,
I don't recall seeing a document on this and the IETF track record has been
quite good.
We should share the joy.
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf