Historic might imply that they were once in service, but have later been
replaced/deprecated. In fact, these protocols were always, and are
still, *experimental*. It would seem logical to assign them the
Experimental category and be done with it.
Bob Braden
On 1/5/2011 9:44 PM, Mykyta Yevstifeyev wrote:
Hello all,
There have been a discussion on tsvwg mailing list about old transport
layer protocols - exactly IRTP (RFC938), RDP (RFC908,1151) and NETBLT
(RFC998). Initially there have been proposed to define IANA
considerations for them. But after a discussion it was found out that it
would be better to move them to Historic. I am writing to request more
wider discussion on this topic.
There is quite strong consensus that IRTP should be Historic. There is a
registered draft on this topic:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-yevstifeyev-tsvwg-irtp-to-historic/
But as for others it should be discussed. Moreover, maybe anyone knows
some other old transport-layer protocols that are no longer in use?
Please copy tour answer to tsvwg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
All the best,
Mykyta Yevstifeyev
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf