31.01.2011 22:38, Stig Venaas wrote:
I have now submitted version 04 which I believe addresses the last
call comments. The changes are as follows:
Added the sentence:
The message type is a 4-bit integer with possible values from 0 to 15.
Listing 11-14 as Unassigned.
Stig,
Thank you very much for your changes. Now the registry definition seems
to be clear.
The references are now all Informational (there was a down reference
to experimental).
Maybe RFC 5226 should be referenced normatively, as well as some docs.
connected to PIMv2. Moreover, the reference to IANA registry should read:
Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) Registry, "IGMP Type
Numbers", per RFC 3228, as for <registry update date, for this -
November 2010>
All the best,
Mykyta Yevstifeyev
There was a comment about expanding the term PIM. PIM has now been
added to the list of well-known abbreviations that don't need to be
expanded. Hence I chose not to expand it.
Stig
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf