----- Original Message -----
From: "Paul Hoffman" <paul(_dot_)hoffman(_at_)vpnc(_dot_)org>
To: "Magnus Westerlund" <magnus(_dot_)westerlund(_at_)ericsson(_dot_)com>
Cc: "Cullen Jennings" <fluffy(_at_)cisco(_dot_)com>; "IESG IESG"
<iesg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org>; "IETF
discussion list" <ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org>
Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2011 6:01 PM
On 2/1/11 2:14 AM, Magnus Westerlund wrote:
Cullen Jennings skrev 2011-01-31 18:44:
<snip>.
Some people say "it doesn't appear that the actual level of security
provided is different if you are forced to use one port or two" and
others disagree.
This did get a thorough airing on the TLS list
in the second week of November
"[TLS] Security concerns around co-locating TLS and non-secure on same port
(WGLC: draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports-08)"
As Paul said, some say yea and others nay.
Tom Petch
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf