Bob,
Are recommendations actually published as BCP?
I only see one BCP with "IPv6" in the title, published back in 2004.
Compared to this, the ipv6ops working group alone has produced dozens of
informational RFCs:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/v6ops/
At least one of these are even explicitly recommendations:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc4890/
Some are targeted at protocol developers, some at vendors, some at
operators. It's quite a mixed bag. :)
I'm not complaining, I just want to know if I am missing an obvious
place.
--
Shane
On Mon, 2011-02-28 at 12:10 +0200, Bob Hinden wrote:
Shane,
Like this one, aren't recommendations usually published as BCPs?
Bob
On Feb 28, 2011, at 11:44 AM, Shane Kerr wrote:
All,
I just happened to notice this document on ietf-announce today:
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-intarea-server-logging-recommendations/
It seems quite reasonable.
My question is... how is this advice expected to trickle out into actual
use? There are more than 6000 RFCs, and they don't seem to be organized
in a useful way that I can find.
I ask because I was going to forward this to an IPv6 operations list,
and thought "hm... what about the rest?" and I realized I did not know,
and did not even know how to find out.
Any advice would be appreciated. Thanks!
--
Shane
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf