On 4/21/2011 12:18 AM, Behcet Sarikaya wrote:
Hi,
It seems like I-D submission for a revised draft (after expiration)
encounters
so many new hurdles:
1. Version number. Submission page complains about the version number even
though it is correct. This seems to be because the system keeps the
expiration
message in html format as the new version to be submitted.
Is there a way to get around this?
Don't let I-Ds expire?
2. RFC XML has changed. It seem like
xml.resource.org has a new xml compiler. I had a lot of trouble in compiling
my
existing xml files.
Hmm. I'm not experiencing any problems, either with the on-line or the
host based tools. Are you sure that your XML was valid before?
I am OK with improving RFC XML but why not keep upward
compatibility?
Regards,
Behcet
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
gwz.vcf
Description: Vcard
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf