ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Revising I-Ds became painful

2011-04-21 15:56:40
On 2011-04-21 17:18, Glen Zorn wrote:
On 4/21/2011 12:18 AM, Behcet Sarikaya wrote:

Hi,
  It seems like I-D submission for a revised draft (after expiration) 
encounters 
so many new hurdles:

1. Version number. Submission page complains about the version number even 
though it is correct. This seems to be because the system keeps the 
expiration 
message in html format as the new version to be submitted. 

Is there a way to get around this?

Don't let I-Ds expire?

I don't understand Behcet's problem statement. But if it's a bug,
please send a very detailed explanation to ietf-action(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, not 
to
the thousands of people on this list.

   Brian
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>