I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART,
please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may
receive.
Document: draft-ietf-dnsop-as112-ops-06
Reviewer: Ben Campbell
Review Date: 2011-04-22
IETF LC End Date: 2011-04-28
IESG Telechat date: 2011-04-28
Summary:
This draft is almost ready for publication as an informational RFC. I have a
small number of minor issue comments that should be considered prior to
publication.
Major issues:
None
Minor issues:
-- General
The draft seems to take the form of a BCP, in that it proposes certain best
practices for configuring and operating AS112 servers. I assume this has
already been considered and discarded--I mention it as an observation only, and
don't expect it to change unless others think it should.
-- Section 2.2:
Are these addresses stable enough to publish them literally?
-- Section 3.3:
Do we really want to be in the business of recommending an operating system?
Even if the recommendation holds true today, it could easily change in the
future. (note that I'm not objecting to using a particular platform for
examples in e doc)
Nits/editorial comments:
-- general
IDNits complains about some obsolete references--please check. It also
complains about non-RFC2606-compliant FQDNs non-RFC5735-compliant IPv4
addresses. I don't think those are applicable since these are, for the most
part, not example names and addresses.
-- Section 1, paragraph 3:
Can you reference something that talks about the AS112 project as a whole?
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf