Hello,
Some comments on this document, currently in Last Call.
Network Working Group M. Westerlund
Internet-Draft Ericsson
Updates:5245 <http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5245> (if approved)
C. Perkins
Intended status: Standards Track University of Glasgow
Expires: September 29, 2011 March 28, 2011
I don't see why the intended status for this document is Standards
Track. Wouldn't Informational be enough? Could you please justify why
have you chosen it?
Your registry description does not mention what is the precise name of
the registry. While everybody understands that is sands for ICE
options, it would be useful to give IANA distinctive guidelines on its
name (this is also required in RFC5226, Section 4.2, 1) in the list;
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5226#section-4.2).
From RFC 5226, also Section 4.2:
5) Initial assignments and reservations. Clear instructions
should be provided to identify any initial assignments or
registrations. In addition, any ranges that are to be reserved
for "Private Use", "Reserved", "Unassigned", etc. should be
clearly indicated.
Are there any initial assignments? Your document mentions one option;
shouldn't it be registered?
A registration request MUST include the following information:
[ . . . ]
Shall this be mentioned as a registration template?
o Email and Address of the Contact person
I think you should add the name of the contact person to the name of
this field as well.
I see, except some aforementioned issues, this document conforms to RFC
5226, particularly Section 4.2.
Thanks in advance for considering my comments.
Mykyta Yevstifeyev
28.04.2011 19:01, The IESG wrote:
The IESG has received a request from the Multiparty Multimedia Session
Control WG (mmusic) to consider the following document:
- 'IANA Registry for Interactive Connectivity Establishment (ICE)
Options'
<draft-ietf-mmusic-ice-options-registry-01.txt> as a Proposed Standard
The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org mailing lists by 2011-05-12. Exceptionally, comments
may be
sent to iesg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org instead. In either case, please retain the
beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
The file can be obtained via
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mmusic-ice-options-registry/
IESG discussion can be tracked via
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mmusic-ice-options-registry/
No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.
_______________________________________________
IETF-Announce mailing list
IETF-Announce(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf