On Apr 28, 2011, at 11:22 AM, Mykyta Yevstifeyev wrote:
Network Working Group M. Westerlund
Internet-Draft Ericsson
Updates:
5245
(if approved) C. Perkins
Intended status: Standards Track University of Glasgow
Expires: September 29, 2011 March 28, 2011
I don't see why the intended status for this document is Standards Track.
Wouldn't Informational be enough? Could you please justify why have you
chosen it?
Just wanted to add my 2 cents that I agree this needs to be Standards Track as
is is effectively a key part of standards track spec that got, uh, forgotten.
Changes to this registration procedure need the standards track level of
approval.
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf