ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [v6ops] Review of: draft-ietf-v6ops-v6-aaaa-whitelisting-implications-03

2011-05-17 10:34:21
On May 16, 2011 11:41 PM, <sthaug(_at_)nethelp(_dot_)no> wrote:

How much longer does this list need to be to justify choosing better
labels for this v6 dual-stack transition hack?

returning different sets of resource records on the basis of the orgin
of a query ala split horizon is not exactly new ground.

By my observation, what is being done, satisfactorily
meets the dictionary definition of a whitelist. the term was
uncontroversial in the dicussion leading up to the wglc. If it's really
inapropiate that's cool but I'm frankly not convinced.

Agreed. I see no good reason to change the use of "whitelist". Let's
move on.


+1 for moving on

Cb
Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug(_at_)nethelp(_dot_)no
_______________________________________________
v6ops mailing list
v6ops(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>