Hi Roni,
My apologies, I completely missed your review.
On 26/04/11 6:22 PM, "Roni Even"
<ron(_dot_)even(_dot_)tlv(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com> wrote:
Summary: This draft is ready for publication as an Informational RFC.
Major issues:
Minor issues:
This is more out of curiosity
1. Why not include it in draft-ietf-grow-mrt-14
I took the stance that the extended additions in geo-mrt may not be the norm
in implementation and sliding the work into draft-ietf-grow-mrt will confuse
more than help.
2. Why is it an Informational RFC and not standard track like the mrt draft.
There was discussion at the time of making draft-ietf-grow-mrt
informational. I took this on board and indeed as of a -14
draft-ietf-grow-mrt is informational
Nits/editorial comments:
1. Need to expand MRT when first mentioned.
I believe these have been fixed in response to Dave Crocker's Apps Area
Review.
Cheers
Terry
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf