ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [v6ops] Review of: draft-ietf-v6ops-v6-aaaa-whitelisting-implications-03 *(formal for apps area)*

2011-06-01 11:59:48
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 6:17 AM, Livingood, Jason <
Jason_Livingood(_at_)cable(_dot_)comcast(_dot_)com> wrote:

  While you have not contributed text per se (by sending it directly), I
try to be a good listener and items you and other Googlers have raised have
been included in the document around motivations and so on. Even new
Sections 3.2 and 3.2 were added based on listening to you and/or your
colleagues talk about the issue (and some direct conversations a couple of
weeks ago).


Sure - anything said at the IETF and on mailing lists is subject to the note
well. But I wouldn't want to be seen as having contributed to the document.

Regards,
Lorenzo
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: [v6ops] Review of: draft-ietf-v6ops-v6-aaaa-whitelisting-implications-03 *(formal for apps area)*, Lorenzo Colitti <=