IETF Discussion (date)
June 30, 2011
- Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Thomas Narten, 23:56
- Re: HOMENET working group proposal, Keith Moore, 20:12
- Re: HOMENET working group proposal, james woodyatt, 19:10
- Re: HOMENET working group proposal, Martin Rex, 18:46
- Re: [fun] [homegate] HOMENET working group proposal, Mark Andrews, 18:21
- Re: [fun] [homegate] HOMENET working group proposal, Masataka Ohta, 16:33
- Re: [homegate] HOMENET working group proposal, james woodyatt, 13:22
- TSVDIR review of draft-ietf-karp-design-guide, Joe Touch, 12:26
- Re: [homegate] HOMENET working group proposal, Keith Moore, 11:38
- Re: HOMENET working group proposal, Keith Moore, 11:35
- Re: HOMENET working group proposal, Martin Rex, 11:15
- Re: [fun] [homegate] HOMENET working group proposal, Keith Moore, 11:06
- Re: [fun] [homegate] HOMENET working group proposal, Fernando Gont, 11:01
- Re: [homegate] HOMENET working group proposal, Keith Moore, 10:47
- Re: [homegate] HOMENET working group proposal, Mark Townsley, 10:37
- Re: [fun] [homegate] HOMENET working group proposal, Stephen [kiwin] PALM, 10:36
- Re: [fun] [homegate] HOMENET working group proposal, Weil, Jason, 10:34
- Re: [homegate] HOMENET working group proposal, Stephen [kiwin] PALM, 10:32
- Re: [homegate] HOMENET working group proposal, Stephen [kiwin] PALM, 10:31
- RE: [homegate] HOMENET working group proposal, erik.taraldsen, 10:29
- Re: [BEHAVE] FW: Last Call: <draft-ietf-behave-ftp64-10.txt> (An FTP ALG for IPv6-to-IPv4 translation) to Proposed Standard, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 10:27
- RE: [fun] [homegate] HOMENET working group proposal, Pascal Thubert (pthubert), 10:25
- Re: [homegate] HOMENET working group proposal, Mark Townsley, 10:23
- Re: [homegate] HOMENET working group proposal, Mikael Abrahamsson, 10:22
- Re: [homegate] HOMENET working group proposal, Mikael Abrahamsson, 10:20
- Re: HOMENET working group proposal, Dan White, 10:18
- MILE 'side meeting' Monday night July 25th, kathleen.moriarty, 10:16
- tsv-dir review of draft-ietf-pim-mtid-08, Marshall Eubanks, 09:23
- Re: [sidr] TSVDIR review of draft-ietf-karp-design-guide, Joe Touch, 09:20
- Re: [sidr] TSVDIR review of draft-ietf-karp-design-guide, Joel M. Halpern, 09:17
- Re: HOMENET working group proposal, Noel Chiappa, 09:05
- Re: [sidr] TSVDIR review of draft-ietf-karp-design-guide, Joe Touch, 08:54
- Re: [sidr] TSVDIR review of draft-ietf-karp-design-guide, Joel M. Halpern, 08:14
- Re: [homegate] HOMENET working group proposal, Fernando Gont, 08:09
- Re: [homegate] HOMENET working group proposal, Keith Moore, 07:22
- Re: HOMENET working group proposal, Keith Moore, 07:17
- Re: HOMENET working group proposal, Eric Burger, 06:59
- Re: HOMENET working group proposal, Ralph Droms, 06:52
- Re: [homegate] HOMENET working group proposal, Fernando Gont, 05:41
- Re: Ietf Digest, Vol 37, Issue 103, otuenehoj, 05:11
- Re: [homegate] HOMENET working group proposal, Jari Arkko, 05:03
- Re: [homegate] HOMENET working group proposal, Fernando Gont, 04:48
- Re: [homegate] HOMENET working group proposal, Jari Arkko, 04:39
- Re: HOMENET working group proposal, Jari Arkko, 04:32
- Re: HOMENET working group proposal, Masataka Ohta, 03:03
- Re: HOMENET working group proposal, Fernando Gont, 02:26
- Re: HOMENET working group proposal, Fernando Gont, 02:13
- Re: [homegate] HOMENET working group proposal, Fernando Gont, 01:52
- Re: HOMENET working group proposal, Masataka Ohta, 01:46
- TSVDIR review of draft-ietf-karp-design-guide, Joe Touch, 00:56
- Re: HOMENET working group proposal, Keith Moore, 00:27
- Re: HOMENET working group proposal, Martin Rex, 00:11
June 29, 2011
- Re: HOMENET working group proposal, Mark Andrews, 23:56
- Re: HOMENET working group proposal, Melinda Shore, 23:52
- Re: HOMENET working group proposal, Keith Moore, 23:33
- Re: HOMENET working group proposal, Martin Rex, 23:26
- Re: HOMENET working group proposal, Masataka Ohta, 22:57
- Re: HOMENET working group proposal, Keith Moore, 22:21
- Re: HOMENET working group proposal, Fernando Gont, 21:57
- Re: HOMENET working group proposal, Cameron Byrne, 21:39
- Re: HOMENET working group proposal, Fernando Gont, 21:19
- Re: Ietf Digest, Vol 37, Issue 103, Amenawon Osa Peter, 17:24
- RE: [ftpext] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ftpext2-hosts-02.txt> (File Transfer Protocol HOST Command for Virtual Hosts) to Proposed Standard, Robert McMurray, 11:36
- HOMENET working group proposal, Jari Arkko, 03:48
June 27, 2011
- Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, Mark Andrews, 19:29
- Re: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, Noel Chiappa, 15:42
- Anyone need a room at the Hilton?, Randall Gellens, 14:27
- Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, Joel Jaeggli, 12:26
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc2672bis-dname-22, Scott Rose, 10:12
- GEN-ART review for draft-li-pwe3-ms-pw-pon-03, kathleen.moriarty, 10:10
- RE: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, John C Klensin, 10:09
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc2672bis-dname-22, Ben Campbell, 10:07
- RE: [ftpext] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ftpext2-hosts-02.txt> (File Transfer Protocol HOST Command for Virtual Hosts) to Proposed Standard, Robert McMurray, 10:05
- Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-roll-of0-14, Roni Even, 04:07
- Re: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, Ole Troan, 03:36
June 26, 2011
- Operations Directorate Review of draft-ietf-soc-overload-design, Warren Kumari, 21:37
- Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, Mark Andrews, 18:11
- Re: draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-05 (Request to move Connection of IPv6 Domains via IPv4 Clouds (6to4) to Historic status) to Informational RFC, Joel Jaeggli, 12:57
- draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-05 (Request to move Connection of IPv6 Domains via IPv4 Clouds (6to4) to Historic status) to Informational RFC, SM, 12:52
- Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, Keith Moore, 08:11
June 25, 2011
- Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, Mykyta Yevstifeyev, 23:53
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3536bis-02.txt> (Terminology Used in Internationalization in the IETF) to BCP, Mykyta Yevstifeyev, 23:46
- RE: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, Murray S. Kucherawy, 23:43
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871bis-12.txt> (DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures) to Draft Standard, Barry Leiba, 21:08
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871bis-12.txt> (DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures) to Draft Standard, Barry Leiba, 20:57
- Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, Joel Jaeggli, 18:48
- Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, Pete Resnick, 16:16
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc2672bis-dname-22.txt> (Update to DNAME Redirection in the DNS) to Proposed Standard, SM, 15:04
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3536bis-02.txt> (Terminology Used in Internationalization in the IETF) to BCP, SM, 15:02
- Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, Joel Jaeggli, 14:19
- Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, Joel Jaeggli, 14:05
- Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, SM, 13:12
- Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, Noel Chiappa, 09:37
- Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, John C Klensin, 09:10
- Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, John Leslie, 08:17
- Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, Brian E Carpenter, 07:12
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871bis-12.txt> (DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures) to Draft Standard, SM, 06:40
- Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, SM, 06:07
- Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, Tim Chown, 04:46
- Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, Keith Moore, 00:25
June 24, 2011
- Re: [ftpext] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ftpext2-hosts-02.txt> (File Transfer Protocol HOST Command for Virtual Hosts) to Proposed Standard, Mykyta Yevstifeyev, 23:32
- RE: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, Christian Huitema, 23:18
- Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, Cullen Jennings, 21:51
- Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, Masataka Ohta, 21:28
- Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, Noel Chiappa, 20:38
- Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, james woodyatt, 20:27
- Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, Joel Jaeggli, 19:12
- Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, Keith Moore, 18:41
- Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, james woodyatt, 18:11
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871bis-12.txt> (DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures) to Draft Standard, Dave CROCKER, 18:00
- Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, John C Klensin, 16:49
- Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, John C Klensin, 16:41
- Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, Keith Moore, 15:55
- Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, Doug Barton, 15:48
- Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, Doug Barton, 15:47
- Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, Keith Moore, 15:45
- Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, John Leslie, 15:18
- Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, Keith Moore, 15:15
- Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, Keith Moore, 15:12
- Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, Doug Barton, 15:06
- Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, Doug Barton, 14:58
- Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, Keith Moore, 14:37
- Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, Cameron Byrne, 14:16
- Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, Donald Eastlake, 14:12
- Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, Julian Reschke, 14:03
- Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, Martin Rex, 13:56
- Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, Noel Chiappa, 13:54
- Re: RFC production center XML format usage, was: [IAOC] xml2rfc and legal services RFPs, Julian Reschke, 13:51
- Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, Julian Reschke, 13:35
- Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, Martin Rex, 13:28
- Nomcom 2011-2012: Second Call for Volunteers, Suresh Krishnan, 13:19
- Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, Donald Eastlake, 13:14
- Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, Melinda Shore, 12:57
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871bis-12.txt> (DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures) to Draft Standard, Al Iverson, 12:47
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871bis-12.txt> (DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures) to Draft Standard, Douglas Otis, 12:34
- Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, Andrew Sullivan, 12:06
- Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, Keith Moore, 11:56
- Re: [ftpext] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ftpext2-hosts-02.txt> (File Transfer Protocol HOST Command for Virtual Hosts) to Proposed Standard, Mykyta Yevstifeyev, 11:52
- RE: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, Noel Chiappa, 11:42
- Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, Keith Moore, 11:39
- RE: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, Murray S. Kucherawy, 11:37
- Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, Martin Rex, 11:33
- Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, RJ Atkinson, 11:18
- Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, John C Klensin, 11:10
- Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, Keith Moore, 10:55
- Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, Paul Hoffman, 10:54
- Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, Keith Moore, 10:40
- Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, Keith Moore, 10:26
- Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, RJ Atkinson, 10:24
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc2672bis-dname-22, Scott Rose, 10:22
- Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-ftpext2-hosts-02, Roni Even, 10:21
- Agenda for IETF 81 not available, Marc Petit-Huguenin, 10:09
- Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, Donald Eastlake, 09:47
- Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, Stephen Farrell, 09:45
- Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, Paul Hoffman, 09:24
- Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, Paul Hoffman, 09:19
- Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, Keith Moore, 09:07
- Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, Keith Moore, 08:43
- Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, John Leslie, 07:56
- Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, Scott Kitterman, 07:42
- Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, Brian E Carpenter, 07:35
- Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, Yang C Sijes, 07:21
- Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, Keith Moore, 06:48
- Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, Keith Moore, 06:36
- Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, Stephen Farrell, 04:41
- Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, t.petch, 04:38
June 23, 2011
- Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Thomas Narten, 23:53
- Re: Last Call: <draft-holsten-about-uri-scheme-06.txt> (The 'about' URI scheme) to Proposed Standard, Mykyta Yevstifeyev, 22:50
- [Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-p2mp-14, Joel M. Halpern, 21:54
- Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, Peter Saint-Andre, 20:38
- Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, Brian E Carpenter, 20:36
- Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, Paul Hoffman, 20:16
- Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, Melinda Shore, 19:58
- Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, Peter Saint-Andre, 19:48
- Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, Paul Hoffman, 17:37
- RE: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, Michel Py, 14:47
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871bis-12.txt> (DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures) to Draft Standard, John Levine, 10:29
- TSVDIR review request - draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-multihoming-without-ipv6nat, David Harrington, 10:05
- Re: Last Call: <draft-holsten-about-uri-scheme-06.txt> (The 'about' URI scheme) to Proposed Standard, Lachlan Hunt, 06:17
- Re: External IPR Disclosures vs IPR disclosures in the document., Michael StJohns, 05:18
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871bis-12.txt> (DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures) to Draft Standard, Doug Otis, 02:42
June 22, 2011
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871bis-12.txt> (DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures) to Draft Standard, Barry Leiba, 23:43
- Re: Second Last Call: <draft-hammer-hostmeta-16.txt> (Web Host Metadata) to Proposed Standard -- feedback, Mark Nottingham, 18:19
- Re: My Internet experience in the West at times is comparable to female foeticide, Dave CROCKER, 15:25
- Re: My Internet experience in the West at times is comparable to female foeticide, Ole Jacobsen, 15:07
- Re: External IPR Disclosures vs IPR disclosures in the document., Scott O. Bradner, 15:05
- Re: External IPR Disclosures vs IPR disclosures in the document., Michael StJohns, 14:57
- Re: My Internet experience in the West at times is comparable to female foeticide, Krishna Birth, 14:52
- Re: My Internet experience in the West at times is comparable to female foeticide, Krishna Birth, 14:49
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871bis-12.txt> (DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures) to Draft Standard, Dave CROCKER, 13:16
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871bis-12.txt> (DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures) to Draft Standard, Scott Kitterman, 12:28
- RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871bis-12.txt> (DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures) to Draft Standard, Murray S. Kucherawy, 12:18
- Google to Host IETF Meeting, IETF Administrative Director, 11:19
- RE: Second Last Call: <draft-hammer-hostmeta-16.txt> (Web Host Metadata) to Proposed Standard -- feedback, Paul E. Jones, 11:05
- Re: Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-04, Ole Troan, 10:48
- Re: External IPR Disclosures vs IPR disclosures in the document., Scott Brim, 10:43
- Re: whine, whine, whine, John Levine, 10:38
- Re: External IPR Disclosures vs IPR disclosures in the document., John C Klensin, 10:31
- External IPR Disclosures vs IPR disclosures in the document., Michael StJohns, 10:12
- Re: My Internet experience in the West at times is comparable to female foeticide, Ted Ts'o, 08:31
- tools.ietf.org problem with RFC-to-be6282 (AUTH48), Mathieu Goessens, 08:22
- Re: My Internet experience in the West at times is comparable to female foeticide, Dave Cridland, 08:00
- Re: whine, whine, whine, Scott Brim, 07:54
- Re: My Internet experience in the West at times is comparable to female foeticide, Ray Bellis, 05:43
- Re: whine, whine, whine, Ray Bellis, 05:37
- My Internet experience in the West at times is comparable to female foeticide, Krishna Birth, 03:59
- Second Last Call: <draft-hammer-hostmeta-16.txt> (Web Host Metadata) to Proposed Standard -- feedback, Mark Nottingham, 00:09
June 21, 2011
- Re: Last Call: <draft-holsten-about-uri-scheme-06.txt> (The 'about' URI scheme) to Proposed Standard, Mykyta Yevstifeyev, 23:39
- Last Call: <draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871bis-12.txt> (DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures) to Draft Standard, Douglas Otis, 20:57
- Re: 25 or 6to4, Keith Moore, 18:32
- Re: 25 or 6to4, Steve Crocker, 17:50
- Re: 25 or 6to4, Ralph Droms, 17:47
- Re: 25 or 6to4, Peter Saint-Andre, 17:18
- Re: 25 or 6to4, Ralph Droms, 17:15
- 25 or 6to4, Peter Saint-Andre, 16:48
- Re: whine, whine, whine, Jari Arkko, 16:42
- RE: Has anyone found a hotel for Quebec City that isn't exorbitant?, Worley, Dale R (Dale), 15:23
- RE: Has anyone found a hotel for Quebec City that isn't exorbitant?, Murray S. Kucherawy, 13:07
- RE: Has anyone found a hotel for Quebec City that isn't exorbitant?, Murray S. Kucherawy, 12:35
- RE: whine, whine, whine, Murray S. Kucherawy, 12:23
- Re: whine, whine, whine, RJ Atkinson, 11:28
- Re: Has anyone found a hotel for Quebec City that isn't exorbitant?, t.petch, 11:25
- Re: whine, whine, whine, Klaas Wierenga, 10:04
- RE: Has anyone found a hotel for Quebec City that isn't exorbitant?, John C Klensin, 09:59
- Re: location preferences, Dave CROCKER, 09:43
- Re: whine, whine, whine, Eliot Lear, 09:41
- Re: whine, whine, whine, Ray Bellis, 09:20
- Re: whine, whine, whine, John Levine, 09:16
- Re: whine, whine, whine, Tim Chown, 08:41
- Re: whine, whine, whine, CAUCHIE Grégory, 08:39
- Re: whine, whine, whine, Ray Bellis, 08:29
- RE: whine, whine, whine, Christer Holmberg, 08:06
- Re: whine, whine, whine, Simon Perreault, 08:02
- Re: whine, whine, whine, Simon Perreault, 07:58
- RE: Has anyone found a hotel for Quebec City that isn't exorbitant?, Adrian Farrel, 07:49
- Re: Has anyone found a hotel for Quebec City that isn't exorbitant?, Lou Berger, 06:49
- Re: location preferences, Joel Jaeggli, 03:11
- Re: Has anyone found a hotel for Quebec City that isn't exorbitant?, Joel Jaeggli, 02:26
- Re: Has anyone found a hotel for Quebec City that isn't exorbitant?, Glen Zorn, 02:18
- Re: Has anyone found a hotel for Quebec City that isn't exorbitant?, Glen Zorn, 02:01
- Re: Has anyone found a hotel for Quebec City that isn't exorbitant?, Joel Jaeggli, 01:49
- Re: Has anyone found a hotel for Quebec City that isn't exorbitant?, Keith Moore, 01:38
- Re: Has anyone found a hotel for Quebec City that isn't exorbitant?, Glen Zorn, 01:17
- Re: Has anyone found a hotel for Quebec City that isn't exorbitant?, Thomas Heide Clausen, 00:31
- Re: whine, whine, whine, John R. Levine, 00:21
- Re: Has anyone found a hotel for Quebec City that isn't exorbitant?, John Levine, 00:11
- Re: whine, whine, whine, Randall Gellens, 00:09
- Re: Has anyone found a hotel for Quebec City that isn't exorbitant?, Mark Andrews, 00:07
- getting there, John Levine, 00:05
June 20, 2011
- Re: Has anyone found a hotel for Quebec City that isn't exorbitant?, Henk Uijterwaal, 23:53
- Thanks! (was: Re: Has anyone found a hotel for Quebec City that isn't exorbitant?), Keith Moore, 23:51
- RE: Has anyone found a hotel for Quebec City that isn't exorbitant?, Murray S. Kucherawy, 23:32
- Re: Has anyone found a hotel for Quebec City that isn't exorbitant?, Joel Jaeggli, 23:31
- RE: Has anyone found a hotel for Quebec City that isn't exorbitant?, Murray S. Kucherawy, 23:26
- Re: Has anyone found a hotel for Quebec City that isn't exorbitant?, Glen Zorn, 23:18
- Re: Has anyone found a hotel for Quebec City that isn't exorbitant?, Glen Zorn, 23:12
- Re: Has anyone found a hotel for Quebec City that isn't exorbitant?, Glen Zorn, 23:08
- whine, whine, whine, John Levine, 22:53
- Re: Has anyone found a hotel for Quebec City that isn't exorbitant?, Stephan Wenger, 20:57
- Re: Has anyone found a hotel for Quebec City that isn't exorbitant?, Henk Uijterwaal, 20:50
- Re: Has anyone found a hotel for Quebec City that isn't exorbitant?, Randall Gellens, 20:26
- Re: location preferences, James M. Polk, 19:25
- Re: Getting to Quebec City, Julien Laganier, 18:30
- Re: location preferences, Dave CROCKER, 18:01
- Re: Getting to Quebec City, Randall Gellens, 17:50
- RE: location preferences, Murray S. Kucherawy, 17:47
- Re: location preferences, Dave CROCKER, 16:57
- location preferences (was: Has anyone found a hotel for Quebec City that isn't exorbitant?), Andrew Sullivan, 16:48
- RE: Has anyone found a hotel for Quebec City that isn't exorbitant?, Sprecher, Nurit (NSN - IL/Hod HaSharon), 15:15
- Re: Has anyone found a hotel for Quebec City that isn't exorbitant?, Mary Barnes, 14:04
- Re: Has anyone found a hotel for Quebec City that isn't exorbitant?, John C Klensin, 13:56
- IETF-meta (Was: Re: Has anyone found a hotel for Quebec City that isn't exorbitant?), Richard L. Barnes, 12:55
- Re: Has anyone found a hotel for Quebec City that isn't exorbitant?, Simon Perreault, 12:42
- Re: Has anyone found a hotel for Quebec City that isn't exorbitant?, Michael Richardson, 12:34
- Re: Has anyone found a hotel for Quebec City that isn't exorbitant?, Thomas Nadeau, 12:27
- Re: Has anyone found a hotel for Quebec City that isn't exorbitant?, Ole Jacobsen, 11:55
- Re: Has anyone found a hotel for Quebec City that isn't exorbitant?, Keith Moore, 11:43
- Re: [codec] Last Call: <draft-ietf-codec-requirements-04.txt> (Codec Requirements) to Informational RFC, Carsten Bormann, 11:03
- RE: Has anyone found a hotel for Quebec City that isn't exorbitant?, John E Drake, 10:52
- Re: Has anyone found a hotel for Quebec City that isn't exorbitant?, Henk Uijterwaal, 09:40
- Gen-ART Telechat Review of draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter-08, Ben Campbell, 09:39
- Gen-ART LC Review of draft-law-rfc4869bis-01, Ben Campbell, 09:37
- Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-04, Ben Campbell, 09:36
- Re: Last Call: <draft-holsten-about-uri-scheme-06.txt> (The 'about' URI scheme) to Proposed Standard, Boris Zbarsky, 09:34
- Re: [codec] Last Call: <draft-ietf-codec-requirements-04.txt> (Codec Requirements) to Informational RFC, Cullen Jennings, 08:32
- Re: Getting to Quebec City, Simon Perreault, 08:02
- Re: Getting to Quebec City, Bob Hinden, 01:01
June 18, 2011
- Re: Getting to Quebec City, Tim Chown, 17:13
- Re: Getting to Quebec City, John R. Levine, 14:47
- Re: Getting to Quebec City, Ole Jacobsen, 14:41
- Re: Getting to Quebec City, Alastair Johnson, 14:09
- Re: Getting to Quebec City, Michael StJohns, 13:51
- Re: Getting to Quebec City, Ole Jacobsen, 11:20
- Re: Has anyone found a hotel for Quebec City that isn't exorbitant?, Scott Brim, 11:11
- Re: Getting to Quebec City, John R. Levine, 11:09
- Re: Getting to Quebec City, Mary Barnes, 10:44
- Re: Has anyone found a hotel for Quebec City that isn't exorbitant?, John Levine, 10:23
- Has anyone found a hotel for Quebec City that isn't exorbitant?, Keith Moore, 09:53
- Re: Getting to Quebec City, Glen Zorn, 01:31
- Re: Getting to Quebec City, Glen Zorn, 01:28
June 17, 2011
- Re: Getting to Quebec City, Hamza GHARSALLAH, 21:14
- Re: Getting to Quebec City, Andrew Sullivan, 20:32
- Re: Getting to Quebec City, Melinda Shore, 19:50
- Re: Getting to Quebec City, Eric Rescorla, 19:32
- Getting to Quebec City, John Levine, 19:10
- Re: [codec] Last Call: <draft-ietf-codec-requirements-04.txt> (Codec Requirements) to Informational RFC, Donald Eastlake, 15:33
- Re: Last Call: <draft-holsten-about-uri-scheme-06.txt> (The 'about' URI scheme) to Proposed Standard, John C Klensin, 11:51
- Re: Last Call: <draft-holsten-about-uri-scheme-06.txt> (The 'about' URI scheme) to Proposed Standard, Julian Reschke, 11:15
- Re: Last Call: <draft-holsten-about-uri-scheme-06.txt> (The 'about' URI scheme) to Proposed Standard, Boris Zbarsky, 10:52
- RE: [codec] Last Call: <draft-ietf-codec-requirements-04.txt> (Codec Requirements) to Informational RFC, Christian Hoene, 10:51
- Re: Last Call: <draft-holsten-about-uri-scheme-06.txt> (The 'about' URI scheme) to Proposed Standard, Boris Zbarsky, 10:49
- Re: Last Call: <draft-holsten-about-uri-scheme-06.txt> (The 'about' URI scheme) to Proposed Standard, Barry Leiba, 08:44
- Re: Last Call: <draft-holsten-about-uri-scheme-06.txt> (The 'about' URI scheme) to Proposed Standard, Michael Richardson, 08:31
- Re: Last Call: <draft-holsten-about-uri-scheme-06.txt> (The 'about' URI scheme) to Proposed Standard, Lachlan Hunt, 06:26
- Re: Last Call: <draft-holsten-about-uri-scheme-06.txt> (The 'about' URI scheme) to Proposed Standard, Eliot Lear, 01:58
- Re: Last Call: <draft-holsten-about-uri-scheme-06.txt> (The 'about' URI scheme) to Proposed Standard, Julian Reschke, 01:54
- Re: Last Call: <draft-holsten-about-uri-scheme-06.txt> (The 'about' URI scheme) to Proposed Standard, Julian Reschke, 01:52
June 16, 2011
- Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Thomas Narten, 23:53
- RE: Last Call: <draft-holsten-about-uri-scheme-06.txt> (The 'about' URI scheme) to Proposed Standard, Murray S. Kucherawy, 23:38
- Re: Last Call: <draft-holsten-about-uri-scheme-06.txt> (The 'about' URI scheme) to Proposed Standard, Mykyta Yevstifeyev, 23:04
- Re: Last Call: <draft-holsten-about-uri-scheme-06.txt> (The 'about' URI scheme) to Proposed Standard, Barry Leiba, 23:02
- Re: Last Call: <draft-holsten-about-uri-scheme-06.txt> (The 'about' URI scheme) to Proposed Standard, Mykyta Yevstifeyev, 22:48
- Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3536bis-02.txt> (Terminology Used in Internationalization in the IETF) to BCP, Barry Leiba, 22:41
- Re: Last Call: <draft-holsten-about-uri-scheme-06.txt> (The 'about' URI scheme) to Proposed Standard, Mykyta Yevstifeyev, 22:30
- Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3536bis-02.txt> (Terminology Used in Internationalization in the IETF) to BCP, Mykyta Yevstifeyev, 22:22
- Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-04.txt> (Request to move Connection of IPv6 Domains via IPv4 Clouds (6to4) to Historic status) to Informational RFC, Mark Smith, 10:22
- Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-04.txt> (Request to move Connection of IPv6 Domains via IPv4 Clouds (6to4) to Historic status) to Informational RFC, Gert Doering, 10:21
- Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-04.txt> (Request to move Connection of IPv6 Domains via IPv4 Clouds (6to4) to Historic status) to Informational RFC, Mark Smith, 10:19
- Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-04.txt> (Request to move Connection of IPv6 Domains via IPv4 Clouds (6to4) to Historic status) to Informational RFC, Lorenzo Colitti, 10:17
- Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-04.txt> (Request to move Connection of IPv6 Domains via IPv4 Clouds (6to4) to Historic status) to Informational RFC, Lorenzo Colitti, 10:16
- Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-04.txt> (Request to move Connection of IPv6 Domains via IPv4 Clouds (6to4) to Historic status) to Informational RFC, Lorenzo Colitti, 10:14
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter-07, Ben Campbell, 10:13
- Re: Last Call: <draft-holsten-about-uri-scheme-06.txt> (The 'about' URI scheme) to Proposed Standard, Boris Zbarsky, 10:11
- Re: Last Call: <draft-holsten-about-uri-scheme-06.txt> (The 'about' URI scheme) to Proposed Standard, Joel M. Halpern, 09:16
- Re: Last Call: <draft-holsten-about-uri-scheme-06.txt> (The 'about' URI scheme) to Proposed Standard, Julian Reschke, 04:36
- Re: Last Call: <draft-holsten-about-uri-scheme-06.txt> (The 'about' URI scheme) to Proposed Standard, Lachlan Hunt, 04:20
- Re: Last Call: <draft-holsten-about-uri-scheme-06.txt> (The 'about' URI scheme) to Proposed Standard, Julian Reschke, 04:15
- Re: Last Call: <draft-holsten-about-uri-scheme-06.txt> (The 'about' URI scheme) to Proposed Standard, Lachlan Hunt, 04:00
June 15, 2011
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871bis-12.txt> (DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures) to Draft Standard, John Levine, 23:48
- Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-04.txt> (Request to move Connection of IPv6 Domains via IPv4 Clouds (6to4) to Historic status) to Informational RFC, Sabahattin Gucukoglu, 21:26
- Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-04.txt> (Request to move Connection of IPv6 Domains via IPv4 Clouds (6to4) to Historic status) to Informational RFC, Mark Andrews, 20:22
- Re: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, Mark Andrews, 19:01
- IETF Fellowship Announcement (IETF 82 and 83), Steve Conte, 18:54
- Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-04.txt> (Request to move Connection of IPv6 Domains via IPv4 Clouds (6to4) to Historic status) to Informational RFC, Keith Moore, 18:40
- Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-04.txt> (Request to move Connection of IPv6 Domains via IPv4 Clouds (6to4) to Historic status) to Informational RFC, Keith Moore, 18:00
- Re: Last Call: <draft-holsten-about-uri-scheme-06.txt> (The 'about' URI scheme) to Proposed Standard, Andrew Sullivan, 15:17
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter-07, Avi Lior, 13:00
- Re: Liaison and request for review of ITU-T document, Ralph Droms, 11:04
- Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-04.txt> (Request to move Connection of IPv6 Domains via IPv4 Clouds (6to4) to Historic status) to Informational RFC, Mark Smith, 10:32
- Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-04.txt> (Request to move Connection of IPv6 Domains via IPv4 Clouds (6to4) to Historic status) to Informational RFC, Mark Smith, 10:30
- Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-04.txt> (Request to move Connection of IPv6 Domains via IPv4 Clouds (6to4) to Historic status) to Informational RFC, Erik Kline, 10:29
- RE: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter-07, Cakulev, Violeta (Violeta), 10:27
- RE: [IPsec] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter-06.txt> (Diameter IKEv2 PSK: Pre-Shared Secret-based Support for IKEv2 Server to Diameter Server Interaction) to Proposed Standard, Cakulev, Violeta (Violeta), 10:26
- Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-04.txt> (Request to move Connection of IPv6 Domains via IPv4 Clouds (6to4) to Historic status) to Informational RFC, Lorenzo Colitti, 10:24
- Re: Last Call: <draft-holsten-about-uri-scheme-06.txt> (The 'about' URI scheme) to Proposed Standard, Mykyta Yevstifeyev, 10:06
- RE: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, Christian Huitema, 09:13
- Re: Last Call: <draft-holsten-about-uri-scheme-06.txt> (The 'about' URI scheme) to Proposed Standard, Julian Reschke, 05:13
- Re: Last Call: <draft-holsten-about-uri-scheme-06.txt> (The 'about' URI scheme) to Proposed Standard, Mykyta Yevstifeyev, 04:07
June 14, 2011
- Re: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, Mark Andrews, 22:05
- Re: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, Noel Chiappa, 21:21
- Re: [IPsec] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter-06.txt> (Diameter IKEv2 PSK: Pre-Shared Secret-based Support for IKEv2 Server to Diameter Server Interaction) to Proposed Standard, Yaron Sheffer, 15:48
- RE: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, Tony Hain, 15:38
- Re: [IPsec] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter-06.txt> (Diameter IKEv2 PSK: Pre-Shared Secret-based Support for IKEv2 Server to Diameter Server Interaction) to Proposed Standard, Yaron Sheffer, 15:19
- Re: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, Keith Moore, 14:00
- Re: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, Joel Jaeggli, 13:53
- Re: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, Keith Moore, 13:47
- Re: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, Joel Jaeggli, 13:37
- Re: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, Keith Moore, 13:35
- RE: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, Tony Hain, 13:17
- Re: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, Keith Moore, 12:56
- Re: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, Ole Troan, 12:43
- Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-04.txt> (Request to move Connection of IPv6 Domains via IPv4 Clouds (6to4) to Historic status) to Informational RFC, james woodyatt, 12:31
- Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-04.txt> (Request to move Connection of IPv6 Domains via IPv4 Clouds (6to4) to Historic status) to Informational RFC, Lorenzo Colitti, 10:15
- Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-04.txt> (Request to move Connection of IPv6 Domains via IPv4 Clouds (6to4) to Historic status) to Informational RFC, Lorenzo Colitti, 10:13
- Re: [PCN] Last Call: <draft-ietf-pcn-cl-edge-behaviour-08.txt> (PCN Boundary Node Behaviour for the Controlled Load (CL) Mode of Operation) to Informational RFC, Tom Taylor, 10:12
- Re: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, Tim Chown, 05:57
- Re: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, Keith Moore, 00:37
June 13, 2011
- RE: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, Michel Py, 23:58
- Re: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, Keith Moore, 23:09
- Nomcom 2011-12: Call for Volunteers, Suresh Krishnan, 12:59
- Re: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, t.petch, 12:09
- Re: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, Steven Bellovin, 11:52
- Re: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, Ofer Inbar, 11:27
- Re: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, Joel Jaeggli, 11:16
- Re: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, Joel Jaeggli, 10:51
- Re: RE: RE: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, Noel Chiappa, 10:42
- Re: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, Noel Chiappa, 10:29
- Re: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, t.petch, 08:55
- Re: RE: RE: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, Cameron Byrne, 08:36
- Re: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, t.petch, 08:19
- Re: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, Jari Arkko, 03:08
- RE: RE: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, Michel Py, 01:27
June 12, 2011
- Re: RE: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, Cameron Byrne, 20:59
- RE: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, Michel Py, 20:19
- Re: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, Keith Moore, 14:55
- Re: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, Doug Barton, 14:45
- RE: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, Michel Py, 14:34
- RE: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, Michel Py, 14:24
- Re: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, Nathaniel Borenstein, 13:50
- TSVDIR review of draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc2672bis-dname, Joe Touch, 08:52
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-pppext-trill-protocol-06.txt> (PPP TRILL Protocol Control Protocol) to Proposed Standard, Jari Arkko, 08:38
- Bring Your Own Server, Krishna Birth, 05:42
June 11, 2011
- Re: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, Keith Moore, 20:29
- Re: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, John R. Levine, 20:23
- Re: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, Michael Richardson, 18:32
- Re: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, Hamza GHARSALLAH, 15:58
- Re: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, John Levine, 15:55
- Re: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, Keith Moore, 14:37
- Re: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, ned+ietf, 14:29
- Re: Last Call: <draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-06.txt> (Reducing the Standards Track to Two Maturity Levels) to BCP, Mykyta Yevstifeyev, 08:47
- Re: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, Masataka Ohta, 05:43
- Re: Last Call: <draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-06.txt> (Reducing the Standards Track to Two Maturity Levels) to BCP, Julian Reschke, 03:00
June 10, 2011
- Re: Last Call: <draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-06.txt> (Reducing the Standards Track to Two Maturity Levels) to BCP, Mykyta Yevstifeyev, 23:36
- RE: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, Michel Py, 22:41
- Re: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, John Levine, 22:32
- Itojun Service Award Announcement, Jun Murai, 20:44
- Re: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, Mark Andrews, 20:08
- Re: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, Masataka Ohta, 19:46
- Re: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, Mark Andrews, 18:52
- Re: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, Mark Andrews, 18:41
- Re: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, John C Klensin, 17:43
- Re: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, james woodyatt, 17:34
- Re: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, Joel Jaeggli, 17:12
- Re: Liaison and request for review of ITU-T document, Brian E Carpenter, 16:47
- Re: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, Masataka Ohta, 16:46
- Re: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, Brian E Carpenter, 16:32
- Re: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, Dave Cridland, 16:12
- Re: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, John C Klensin, 16:07
- RFP for Secretariat Services, IETF Administrative Director, 13:43
- Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-04.txt>, james woodyatt, 13:42
- Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-04.txt> (Request to move Connection of IPv6 Domains via IPv4 Clouds (6to4) to Historic status) to Informational RFC, Keith Moore, 13:30
- Re: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, james woodyatt, 13:28
- Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-04.txt>, Keith Moore, 13:22
- RE: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-04.txt> (Request to move Connection of IPv6 Domains via IPv4 Clouds (6to4) to Historic status) to Informational RFC, Templin, Fred L, 13:17
- Gen-art LC review of draft-ietf-pcn-cl-edge-behaviour-08, Elwyn Davies, 13:00
- Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-04.txt> (Request to move Connection of IPv6 Domains via IPv4 Clouds (6to4) to Historic status) to Informational RFC, Joel Jaeggli, 12:58
- Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-04.txt> (Request to move Connection of IPv6 Domains via IPv4 Clouds (6to4) to Historic status) to Informational RFC, Michael Richardson, 12:44
- Re: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, Michael Richardson, 12:42
- Re: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, Brian E Carpenter, 12:39
- Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-04.txt> (Request to move Connection of IPv6 Domains via IPv4 Clouds (6to4) to Historic status) to Informational RFC, james woodyatt, 12:17
- RE: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, John C Klensin, 12:07
- Re: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, Brian E Carpenter, 12:06
- Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-04.txt> (Request to move Connection of IPv6 Domains via IPv4 Clouds (6to4) to Historic status) to Informational RFC, Noel Chiappa, 11:27
- Re: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, Nathaniel Borenstein, 11:23
- RE: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, Worley, Dale R (Dale), 11:22
- Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-04.txt> (Request to move Connection of IPv6 Domains via IPv4 Clouds (6to4) to Historic status) to Informational RFC, Lorenzo Colitti, 11:21
- Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-04.txt> (Request to move Connection of IPv6 Domains via IPv4 Clouds (6to4) to Historic status) to Informational RFC, Lorenzo Colitti, 11:19
- Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-04.txt> (Request to move Connection of IPv6 Domains via IPv4 Clouds (6to4) to Historic status) to Informational RFC, Lorenzo Colitti, 11:17
- Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-04.txt> (Request to move Connection of IPv6 Domains via IPv4 Clouds (6to4) to Historic status) to Informational RFC, Lorenzo Colitti, 11:15
- Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-04.txt> (Request to move Connection of IPv6 Domains via IPv4 Clouds (6to4) to Historic status) to Informational RFC, Lorenzo Colitti, 11:13
- Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-04.txt> (Request to move Connection of IPv6 Domains via IPv4 Clouds (6to4) to Historic status) to Informational RFC, Lorenzo Colitti, 11:12
- RE: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, Tony Hain, 11:04
- Re: Last Call: <draft-iesg-rfc1150bis-01.txt> (Conclusion of FYI RFC Sub-series) to Informational RFC, Mykyta Yevstifeyev, 09:47
- Re: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, John C Klensin, 09:44
- Re: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, Keith Moore, 08:51
- Re: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, Brian E Carpenter, 08:35
- Re: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, Bert (IETF) Wijnen, 08:11
- Re: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, Thomas Nadeau, 08:04
- Re: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, TJ, 06:37
- Re: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, otunte otueneh, 04:56
- Re: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, Stefan Winter, 04:10
- Re: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, otunte otueneh, 02:52
- Re: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, Sabahattin Gucukoglu, 02:49
- Re: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, Stefan Winter, 01:33
- Re: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, Roger Jørgensen, 01:16
- Re: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, Hector Santos, 00:36
June 09, 2011
- Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Thomas Narten, 23:54
- RE: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, Michel Py, 22:39
- Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-04.txt>, Martin Rex, 21:41
- Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-04.txt>, Mark Andrews, 21:01
- Re: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, Masataka Ohta, 20:49
- Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-04.txt>, Randy Presuhn, 20:22
- Re: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, Mark Andrews, 19:58
- Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-04.txt>, Keith Moore, 19:52
- Re: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, ned+ietf, 17:29
- Re: [v6ops] Last Call:, Martin Rex, 16:32
- Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-04.txt> (Request to move Connection of IPv6 Domains via IPv4 Clouds (6to4) to Historic status) to Informational RFC, Tim Chown, 14:37
- Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-04.txt> (Request to move Connection of IPv6 Domains via IPv4 Clouds (6to4) to Historic status) to Informational RFC, Brian E Carpenter, 14:04
- Re: one data point regarding native IPv6 support, james woodyatt, 13:56
- Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-04.txt> (Request to move Connection of IPv6 Domains via IPv4 Clouds (6to4) to Historic status) to Informational RFC, Keith Moore, 13:54
- Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-04.txt> (Request to move Connection of IPv6 Domains via IPv4 Clouds (6to4) to Historic status) to Informational RFC, Keith Moore, 13:39
- one data point regarding native IPv6 support, Keith Moore, 13:25
- Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-04.txt> (Request to move Connection of IPv6 Domains via IPv4 Clouds (6to4) to Historic status) to Informational RFC, james woodyatt, 13:05
- Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-04.txt> (Request to move Connection of IPv6 Domains via IPv4 Clouds (6to4) to Historic status) to Informational RFC, Keith Moore, 12:59
- Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-04.txt>, Randy Presuhn, 12:56
- Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-04.txt> (Request to move Connection of IPv6 Domains via IPv4 Clouds (6to4) to Historic status) to Informational RFC, Keith Moore, 12:41
- Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-04.txt>, TJ, 12:38
- Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-04.txt>(Request to move Connection of IPv6 Domains via IPv4Clouds (6to4) to Historic status) to Informational RFC, Keith Moore, 12:28
- Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-04.txt>, Randy Presuhn, 12:27
- Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-04.txt> (Request to move Connection of IPv6 Domains via IPv4 Clouds (6to4) to Historic status) to Informational RFC, Keith Moore, 12:21
- Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-04.txt> (Request to move Connection of IPv6 Domains via IPv4 Clouds (6to4) to Historic status) to Informational RFC, Brian E Carpenter, 11:44
- Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-04.txt> (Request to move Connection of IPv6 Domains via IPv4 Clouds (6to4) to Historic status) to Informational RFC, Philip Homburg, 11:43
- Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-04.txt>(Request to move Connection of IPv6 Domains via IPv4Clouds (6to4) to Historic status) to Informational RFC, Gert Doering, 11:41
- RE: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-04.txt>(Request to move Connection of IPv6 Domains via IPv4Clouds (6to4) to Historic status) to Informational RFC, Gunter Van de Velde (gvandeve), 11:40
- Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-04.txt> (Request to move Connection of IPv6 Domains via IPv4 Clouds (6to4) to Historic status) to Informational RFC, Gert Doering, 11:38
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc2672bis-dname-22, Ben Campbell, 11:36
- RE: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-04.txt> (Request to move Connection of IPv6 Domains via IPv4 Clouds (6to4) to Historic status) to Informational RFC, Dmitry Anipko, 11:34
- RE: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-04.txt> (Request to move Connection of IPv6 Domains via IPv4 Clouds (6to4) to Historic status) to Informational RFC, George, Wesley, 11:32
- Re: Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc2672bis-dname-22, Scott Rose, 11:30
- Re: Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc2672bis-dname-22, Scott Rose, 11:28
- Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-04.txt> (Request to move Connection of IPv6 Domains via IPv4 Clouds (6to4) to Historic status) to Informational RFC, Noel Chiappa, 11:26
- Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-04.txt>(Request to move Connection of IPv6 Domains via IPv4Clouds (6to4) to Historic status) to Informational RFC, Joel Jaeggli, 11:19
- RE: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-04.txt> (Request to move Connection of IPv6 Domains via IPv4 Clouds (6to4) to Historic status) to Informational RFC, Christian Huitema, 11:02
- Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-04.txt>(Request to move Connection of IPv6 Domains via IPv4Clouds (6to4) to Historic status) to Informational RFC, Keith Moore, 10:56
- Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-04.txt>(Request to move Connection of IPv6 Domains via IPv4Clouds (6to4) to Historic status) to Informational RFC, Keith Moore, 10:51
- Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-04.txt> (Request to move Connection of IPv6 Domains via IPv4 Clouds (6to4) to Historic status) to Informational RFC, Keith Moore, 10:43
- Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-04.txt>(Request to move Connection of IPv6 Domains via IPv4Clouds (6to4) to Historic status) to Informational RFC, Roger Jørgensen, 10:25
- Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-04.txt>(Request to move Connection of IPv6 Domains via IPv4Clouds (6to4) to Historic status) to Informational RFC, Joel Jaeggli, 10:21
- Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-04.txt>(Request to move Connection of IPv6 Domains via IPv4Clouds (6to4) to Historic status) to Informational RFC, Keith Moore, 10:07
- Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-04.txt> (Request to move Connection of IPv6 Domains via IPv4 Clouds (6to4) to Historic status) to Informational RFC, Keith Moore, 09:38
- Re: compromise on the 6to4->Historic debate, Keith Moore, 08:26
- Re: compromise on the 6to4->Historic debate, Mark Andrews, 03:05
June 08, 2011
- Re: compromise on the 6to4->Historic debate, Keith Moore, 22:46
- Re: compromise on the 6to4->Historic debate, Mark Andrews, 22:36
- Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-04.txt> (Request to move Connection of IPv6 Domains via IPv4 Clouds (6to4) to Historic status) to Informational RFC, Keith Moore, 19:32
- Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-04.txt> (Request to move Connection of IPv6 Domains via IPv4 Clouds (6to4) to Historic status) to Informational RFC, james woodyatt, 18:22
- Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-04.txt> (Request to move Connection of IPv6 Domains via IPv4 Clouds (6to4) to Historic status) to Informational RFC, Tim Chown, 18:06
- Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-04.txt> (Request to move Connection of IPv6 Domains via IPv4 Clouds (6to4) to Historic status) to Informational RFC, Joel Jaeggli, 16:24
- compromise on the 6to4->Historic debate, Keith Moore, 15:55
- Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-04.txt>, Martin Rex, 15:37
- Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-04.txt> (Request to move Connection of IPv6 Domains via IPv4 Clouds (6to4) to Historic status) to Informational RFC, Keith Moore, 15:20
- Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-04.txt>, Randy Presuhn, 13:42
- Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-04.txt>, Brian E Carpenter, 12:53
- Re: Summary for IESG last call to 5892bis draft, Pete Resnick, 12:13
- Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-04.txt>, james woodyatt, 11:18
- Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-04.txt>, Noel Chiappa, 11:05
- Summary for IESG last call to 5892bis draft, Jiankang YAO, 10:53
- Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-faltstrom-5892bis-04, Vint Cerf, 10:51
- Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-vcat-lcas-13, kathleen.moriarty, 10:50
- Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc2672bis-dname-22, Ben Campbell, 10:48
- RE: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-04.txt> (Request to move Connection of IPv6 Domains via IPv4 Clouds (6to4) to Historic status) to Informational RFC, George, Wesley, 10:46
- Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-04.txt>, Martin Rex, 10:43
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dhc-subnet-alloc-12.txt> (Subnet Allocation Option) to Informational RFC, Alexandru Petrescu, 09:30
- Re: Contents of the IDNA Derived Properties registry (was; Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-faltstrom-5892bis-04), Russ Housley, 09:00
- Contents of the IDNA Derived Properties registry (was; Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-faltstrom-5892bis-04), John C Klensin, 07:33
- Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-faltstrom-5892bis-04, John C Klensin, 06:58
- Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-faltstrom-5892bis-04, Alexey Melnikov, 06:56
- Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-faltstrom-5892bis-04, Alexey Melnikov, 06:51
- Re: Last Call: <draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-06.txt> (Reducing the Standards Track to Two Maturity Levels) to BCP, Dave Cridland, 02:59
- Re: Last Call: <draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-06.txt> (Reducing the Standards Track to Two Maturity Levels) to BCP, Andrew Sullivan, 00:29
June 07, 2011
- Re: Last Call: <draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-06.txt> (Reducing the Standards Track to Two Maturity Levels) to BCP, Pete Resnick, 23:58
- Re: Last Call: <draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-06.txt> (Reducing the Standards Track to Two Maturity Levels) to BCP, Peter Saint-Andre, 23:01
- Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-faltstrom-5892bis-04, Paul Hoffman, 21:46
- Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-faltstrom-5892bis-04, John C Klensin, 20:25
- Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-04.txt> (Request to move Connection of IPv6 Domains via IPv4 Clouds (6to4) to Historic status) to Informational RFC, Keith Moore, 18:24
- Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-faltstrom-5892bis-04, Paul Hoffman, 16:44
- Liaison and request for review of ITU-T document, Ralph Droms, 15:28
- RE: Gen-ART LC review of draft-faltstrom-5892bis-04, rontlv, 14:31
- Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-04.txt>, Martin Rex, 13:50
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-04.txt> (Request to move Connection of IPv6 Domains via IPv4 Clouds (6to4) to Historic status) to Informational RFC, Keith Moore, 13:21
- Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-faltstrom-5892bis-04, Paul Hoffman, 11:39
- Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-04.txt> (Request to move Connection of IPv6 Domains via IPv4 Clouds (6to4 to Historic status) to Informational RFC, Brian E Carpenter, 10:46
- RE: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-04.txt> (Request to move Connection of IPv6 Domains via IPv4 Clouds (6to4) to Historic status) to Informational RFC, George, Wesley, 10:31
- Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-04.txt> (Request to move Connection of IPv6 Domains via IPv4 Clouds (6to4) to Historic status) to Informational RFC, Cameron Byrne, 10:30
- RE: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-04.txt> (Request to move Connection of IPv6 Domains via IPv4 Clouds (6to4) to Historic status) to Informational RFC, George, Wesley, 10:28
- Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-04.txt> (Request to move Connection of IPv6 Domains via IPv4 Clouds (6to4) to Historic status) to Informational RFC, Gert Doering, 10:26
- Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-04.txt> (Request to move Connection of IPv6 Domains via IPv4 Clouds (6to4) to Historic status) to Informational RFC, Keith Moore, 10:22
- Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: fun -- FUture home Networking (FUN), John C Klensin, 09:21
- Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-04.txt> (Request to move Connection of IPv6 Domains via IPv4 Clouds (6to4) to Historic status) to Informational RFC, TJ, 08:39
- Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-04.txt> (Request to move Connection of IPv6 Domains via IPv4 Clouds (6to4) to Historic status) to Informational RFC, TJ, 06:34
- RE: Gen-ART LC review of draft-faltstrom-5892bis-04, rontlv, 05:56
- Re: TSVDIR Review for draft-ohba-pana-relay-03, Yoshifumi Nishida, 03:53
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-04.txt> (Request to move Connection of IPv6 Domains via IPv4 Clouds (6to4) to Historic status) to Informational RFC, Ole Troan, 03:51
- Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-04.txt> (Request to move Connection of IPv6 Domains via IPv4 Clouds (6to4) to Historic status) to Informational RFC, Tim Chown, 02:16
- Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: fun -- FUture home Networking (FUN), Jari Arkko, 00:02
June 06, 2011
- Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: fun -- FUture home Networking (FUN), Barry Leiba, 23:57
- Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: fun -- FUture home Networking (FUN), John C Klensin, 21:17
- Re: Proposed text for IESG Handling of Historic Status, Barry Leiba, 20:23
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-04.txt> (Request to move Connection of IPv6 Domains via IPv4 Clouds (6to4) to Historic status) to Informational RFC, TJ, 18:42
- Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-faltstrom-5892bis-04, Paul Hoffman, 17:14
- Subversion troubles?, Stuart Cheshire, 17:13
- Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: fun -- FUture home Networking (FUN), Stephane Bortzmeyer, 15:48
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-04.txt> (Request to move Connection of IPv6 Domains via IPv4 Clouds (6to4) to Historic status) to Informational RFC, Sabahattin Gucukoglu, 12:51
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-04.txt> (Request to move Connection of IPv6 Domains via IPv4 Clouds (6to4) to Historic status) to Informational RFC, Keith Moore, 12:23
- Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter-07, Ben Campbell, 12:00
- Re: TSVDIR Review for draft-ohba-pana-relay-03, Yoshihiro Ohba, 08:01
- Re: tsv-dir review of draft-ietf-behave-ftp64-10, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 04:44
- Individual submission rationale - draft-brasher-ltasp-05, Damian L Brasher, 04:43
- TSVDIR Review for draft-ohba-pana-relay-03, Yoshifumi Nishida, 03:39
June 03, 2011
- tsv-dir review of draft-ietf-behave-ftp64-10, Fernando Gont, 17:17
- RE: Second Last Call: <draft-ietf-dkim-mailinglists-11.txt> (DKIM And Mailing Lists) to BCP, Murray S. Kucherawy, 16:25
- Re: [IPsec] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter-06.txt> (Diameter IKEv2 PSK: Pre-Shared Secret-based Support for IKEv2 Server to Diameter Server Interaction) to Proposed Standard, Yaron Sheffer, 15:33
- Re: Second Last Call: <draft-ietf-dkim-mailinglists-11.txt> (DKIM And Mailing Lists) to BCP, John Levine, 14:35
- Applied Networking Research Prize awards for IETF-81, Lars Eggert, 10:43
- Re: [dnsext] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-registry-fixes-08.txt> (Applicability Statement: DNS Security (DNSSEC) DNSKEY Algorithm IANA Registry) to Proposed Standard, Scott Rose, 10:41
- Re: Proposed text for IESG Handling of Historic Status, Mykyta Yevstifeyev, 01:50
- Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Thomas Narten, 00:04
June 02, 2011
- Re: Proposed text for IESG Handling of Historic Status, John C Klensin, 22:05
- Re: Proposed text for IESG Handling of Historic Status, SM, 21:44
- Re: Proposed text for IESG Handling of Historic Status, Pete Resnick, 17:53
- Re: Proposed text for IESG Handling of Historic Status, Scott Brim, 16:46
- RE: Proposed text for IESG Handling of Historic Status, Murray S. Kucherawy, 15:15
- Re: Proposed text for IESG Handling of Historic Status, John C Klensin, 15:05
- Re: Proposed text for IESG Handling of Historic Status, Sam Hartman, 14:48
- Proposed text for IESG Handling of Historic Status, Sean Turner, 14:18
- Re: [dnsext] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-registry-fixes-08.txt> (Applicability Statement: DNS Security (DNSSEC) DNSKEY Algorithm IANA Registry) to Proposed Standard, Edward Lewis, 13:35
- Proposed text for IESG Processing of RFC Errata concerning RFC Metadata, Stewart Bryant, 13:23
- RE: [IPsec] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter-06.txt> (Diameter IKEv2 PSK: Pre-Shared Secret-based Support for IKEv2 Server to Diameter Server Interaction) to Proposed Standard, Cakulev, Violeta (Violeta), 10:27
- Re: [dnsext] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-registry-fixes-08.txt> (Applicability Statement: DNS Security (DNSSEC) DNSKEY Algorithm IANA Registry) to Proposed Standard, Scott Rose, 10:25
- Concerns about the recent IPR Statement from Alcatel Lucent Related to RFC 6073, Russ Housley, 09:07
- Re: [dnsext] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-registry-fixes-08.txt> (Applicability Statement: DNS Security (DNSSEC) DNSKEY Algorithm IANA Registry) to Proposed Standard, Edward Lewis, 07:55
June 01, 2011
- Re: Problems with online booking for the Hotel Delta Quebec?, John Levine, 17:23
- Problems with online booking for the Hotel Delta Quebec?, Ross Finlayson, 17:00
- Re: [dnsext] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-registry-fixes-08.txt> (Applicability Statement: DNS Security (DNSSEC) DNSKEY Algorithm IANA Registry) to Proposed Standard, Andrew Sullivan, 15:35
- Re: [dnsext] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-registry-fixes-08.txt> (Applicability Statement: DNS Security (DNSSEC) DNSKEY Algorithm IANA Registry) to Proposed Standard, Edward Lewis, 14:46
- Re: [dnsext] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-registry-fixes-08.txt> (Applicability Statement: DNS Security (DNSSEC) DNSKEY Algorithm IANA Registry) to Proposed Standard, Edward Lewis, 14:30
- secdir review of draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc2672bis-dname-22.txt, Stephen Hanna, 13:21
- Re: [dnsext] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-registry-fixes-08.txt> (Applicability Statement: DNS Security (DNSSEC) DNSKEY Algorithm IANA Registry) to Proposed Standard, Andrew Sullivan, 12:53
- Re: [v6ops] Review of: draft-ietf-v6ops-v6-aaaa-whitelisting-implications-03 *(formal for apps area)*, Lorenzo Colitti, 11:59
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-registry-fixes-08.txt> (Applicability Statement: DNS Security (DNSSEC) DNSKEY Algorithm IANA Registry) to Proposed Standard, Edward Lewis, 10:05
- Re: Last Call: <draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-06.txt> (Reducing the Standards Track to Two Maturity Levels) to BCP, Alessandro Vesely, 05:11