ietf
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: Proposed text for IESG Handling of Historic Status

2011-06-06 20:23:45
from [Barry Leiba] [Permanent Link] 
My understanding is that any RFC can be moved to Historic. But if this
is not clear from RFC 2026, maybe it is worth clarifying.


If 2026 doesn't limit what types of RFCs can become Historic, then I presume
any of them can.  I'm not sure we need to make that explicit.


I'm sure we don't.  There's no need to change anything in this regard.

Barry
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-04.txt> (Request to move Connection of IPv6 Domains via IPv4 Clouds (6to4) to Historic status) to Informational RFC, TJ
Next by Date:  Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: fun -- FUture home Networking (FUN), John C Klensin
Previous by Thread:  RE: Proposed text for IESG Handling of Historic Status, Murray S. Kucherawy
Next by Thread:  Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Thomas Narten
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]