On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 11:53 AM, Noel Chiappa
<jnc(_at_)mercury(_dot_)lcs(_dot_)mit(_dot_)edu> wrote:
> From: Brian E Carpenter
<brian(_dot_)e(_dot_)carpenter(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com>
> I suspect that operators are *severely* under-represented on this
> list (ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org) because it is very noisy and operators
have
> other priorities.
Yes, and this thread is noise. In fact, Noel comments are
specifically off-topic and should be a new thread which can get added
the old thread about 6to4.
Ah, operators. This would be the same group of people of whom, if the
recent anecdotal reports are much to go on, many (most?) are not bothering
to deploy IPv6 at all?
Which operator is not actively working on IPv6 projects *right now*?
Seriously, that old statement does not hold water today.
(Something which would seem to be very common among smaller operators,
whom one assumes, in typical long-tail fashion, form the majority of the
group.)
But their views are paramount?
I see.
Not taking the bait. Let's move.
Noel
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf