In message <B91BB6CD-656F-4935-B513-A6225C8F3973(_at_)bogus(_dot_)com>, Joel
Jaeggli writ
es:
On Jun 25, 2011, at 5:11 AM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
On 2011-06-25 13:38, Noel Chiappa wrote:
From: james woodyatt <jhw(_at_)apple(_dot_)com>
I supported 6to4-advisory and strenuously argued against taking up
6to4-to-historic.
...
I can see how 6to4-to-historic may divert its intended audience from
reading the much more important 6to4-advisory draft
I must admit, it does seem a little odd to issue two documents, one fixin
g a
protocol that you're about to declare obsolete with the other...
Not so odd. There are hundreds of millions of hosts out there that attempt
to use 6to4 by default, and (probably) thousands of relay routers that
attempt to support such users. Those boxes will be around for years, and a
re
the target for the -advisory draft, regardless of the deprecation.
the very fact that the devices are largely unmanaged, means that if you don'
t want to break them worse then they already are that you have continue to s
upport them until they age out of the network.
And historic just told CISCO and Juniper to stop supporting 6to4 in their
big iron. The very boxes that need to remain to the end supporting 6to4
because they are managed boxes.
Brian
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
--
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: marka(_at_)isc(_dot_)org
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf