ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-05 (Request to move Connection of IPv6 Domains via IPv4 Clouds (6to4) to Historic status) to Informational RFC

2011-06-26 12:57:27

On Jun 26, 2011, at 10:49 AM, SM wrote:

Hello,

The IANA IPv4/IPv6 Address Space registries currently have the following 
status: RESERVED, LEGACY, ALLOCATED and UNALLOCATED.  Is IANA marking the 
192.88.99.0/24 prefix and 2002::/16 prefix as "deprecated" or is it using an 
existing status?

BCP 153 lists 192.88.99.0/24 as allocated.  The IANA registry lists it as 
"reserved".

The assumption (vis--a-vis the discussion in the wg on a or lack of sunset 
period (and there's a longish port of the thread on this)) is that the prefixs 
would remain in use for the for the forseeable future. there would therefore be 
no change required to the status of the  prefixes.

According to the Writeup:

"This draft represents the intersection of those views -
 rough consensus in the best possible meaning of the phrase."

Will the IESG be using the following text:

 "It has been approved for publication by the Internet
  Engineering Steering Group (IESG)."

for the second paragraph of the "Status of This Memo"?

Regards,
-sm

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>