On Jun 26, 2011, at 4:09 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
In message <B91BB6CD-656F-4935-B513-A6225C8F3973(_at_)bogus(_dot_)com>, Joel
Jaeggli writ
es:
On Jun 25, 2011, at 5:11 AM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
Not so odd. There are hundreds of millions of hosts out there that attempt
to use 6to4 by default, and (probably) thousands of relay routers that
attempt to support such users. Those boxes will be around for years, and a
re
the target for the -advisory draft, regardless of the deprecation.
the very fact that the devices are largely unmanaged, means that if you don'
t want to break them worse then they already are that you have continue to s
upport them until they age out of the network.
And historic just told CISCO and Juniper to stop supporting 6to4 in their
big iron. The very boxes that need to remain to the end supporting 6to4
because they are managed boxes.
I think this argument is somewhat orthogonal to the problem of supporting
end-systems... However if your want to explore it, think the author is probably
in a position to interpret the draft on behalf of his company. Juniper doesn't
support 6to4 on the big iron.
Brian
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
--
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: marka(_at_)isc(_dot_)org
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf