On Jun 12, 2011 11:26 PM, "Michel Py"
<michel(_at_)arneill-py(_dot_)sacramento(_dot_)ca(_dot_)us>
wrote:
Cameron Byrne wrote:
The faint promise of yet another transition mechanism is hardly
a motivation to keep 6to4 around. The data (ripe ...)
overwhelming proves default-on 6to4 clients + thinly deployed
relays = unreliable ipv6 and ipv6 deployment obstacle.
That's the difference between a fait promise and a proven failure. The
promise of "IPv6 native IPv6 is going to be deployed next year" has failed
for 10+ years in a row. Nobody believes in it anymore; your choices are to
believe in yet another transition mechanism or switch to the post-mortem
camp.
I believe there is data to show this time is different (iana and apnic are
exhausted, successful v6day, docsis 3.0 and LTE deployment ...)
Get a life.
Thanks
Cb
Michel.
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf