ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [codec] Last Call: <draft-ietf-codec-requirements-04.txt> (Codec Requirements) to Informational RFC

2011-06-17 15:33:15
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 4:42 PM, Christian Hoene 
<hoene(_at_)uni-tuebingen(_dot_)de> wrote:
Hello,

In this draft, the editors of draft are not named as editors but as authors.
Thus, I would suggest to follow the example given in
http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5620.txt and add an ", Ed." behind the
names. A list of authors is given in the acknowledgement section of the
draft.

If everyone listed at the upper right of the first page is going to be
an Editor, then adding "Ed." after their name is completely
superfluous and adds only clutter.

Traditionally, those listed at the upper right of the first page of an
RFC have been called "authors" in most cases, regardless of their
actual role, and those listed in an Acknowledgements section have
frequently been called "contributors" or the like. So I think it s
perfectly fine the way it is in regards to this non-issue.

Donald

With best regards,

 Christian Hoene


-----Original Message-----
From: codec-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org 
[mailto:codec-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org] On Behalf
Of The IESG
Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2011 9:24 PM
To: IETF-Announce
Cc: codec(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
Subject: [codec] Last Call: <draft-ietf-codec-requirements-04.txt> (Codec
Requirements) to Informational RFC


The IESG has received a request from the Internet Wideband Audio Codec
WG
(codec) to consider the following document:
- 'Codec Requirements'
  <draft-ietf-codec-requirements-04.txt> as an Informational RFC

The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org mailing lists by 2011-06-30. Exceptionally, 
comments may be
sent to iesg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org instead. In either case, please retain the
beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.

Abstract


   This document provides specific requirements for an Internet audio
   codec.  These requirements address quality, sampling rate, bit-rate,
   and packet loss robustness, as well as other desirable properties.




The file can be obtained via
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-codec-requirements/

IESG discussion can be tracked via
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-codec-requirements/


No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.


_______________________________________________
codec mailing list
codec(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codec

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf