On Jun 10, 2011, at 15:10 , Joel Jaeggli wrote:
I think the two documents at present encourage:
* vendors an implementors to consider not using or a least disabling by
default 6to4 auto-tunneling in existing and future implementations.
* the deployment of additional 6to4 anycast relays which if done would help
address issue that existing users of 6to4 who will be with us for a while as
well as those who would prefer to use it would benefit from.
I would say that I-D.ietf-v6ops-6to4-advisory suffices to encourage both those
things with more precision and clarity than I-D.ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic
does.
In fact, I-D.ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic makes a more aggressive point on the
first item, and sends, at best, a very mixed message about the second.
--
james woodyatt <jhw(_at_)apple(_dot_)com>
member of technical staff, core os networking
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf