RE: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?

It seems that we have wide consensus to publish the advisory document, not so 
much for the "6to4 historic" part. Can we just publish the advisory and be done 
with this thread?

-- Christian Huitema


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, (continued) Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, John C Klensin Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, Doug Barton Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, Keith Moore Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, Doug Barton Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, John C Klensin Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, james woodyatt Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, Keith Moore Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, Joel Jaeggli Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, james woodyatt Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, Masataka Ohta RE: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, Christian Huitema <= Message not available Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, Tim Chown RE: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, John C Klensin Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, Keith Moore Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, John C Klensin Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, Keith Moore Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, Doug Barton Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, Keith Moore Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, Doug Barton Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, Keith Moore Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?, Joel Jaeggli