On 06/24/2011 13:11, Keith Moore wrote:
On Jun 24, 2011, at 3:57 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
By "your document" above are you referring to
Brian'shttp://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-advisory? If
so I would argue that the extensive WG discussion about both documents
meets your criteria. Taken together the 2 documents represent a series
of compromises between those of us whose opinion is "Kill 6to4 dead,
yesterday" and those who would like to give it as graceful an exit as
possible.
Taken together, the message is confusing.
I'm not sure why you would think that. It fits in with a grand IETF
tradition. :)
And for those of you whose opinion is "KIll 6to4 dead, yesterday" -
that's way beyond the scope of what v6ops was chartered to do.
ENONSEQUITUR
--
Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much.
-- OK Go
Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS.
Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf