james woodyatt wrote:
No, the WG supporters of this draft are firmly convinced that
6to4-to-historic is also necessary because they mistakenly
believe it does something else that 6to4-advisory does not say.
That IETF declare 6to4 historic means that IETF, naturally,
won't produce any new document on 6to4.
Masataka Ohta
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf