On Jun 24, 2011, at 4:46 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
I've been reviewing the WGLC comments. I haven't finished doing so yet,
but so far my impression is that the discussion was both thorough and
well-organized.
You might want to go further back in the archives than just the LC. There was
quite a bit of discussion on both drafts.
I've read some of it, and participated in some of the discussion for -advisory.
Though my immediate question has been whether the WG really had rough
consensus, and I don't think the other WG discussion matters too much in
gauging that.
Keith
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf