On Jun 24, 2011, at 1:54 PM, Keith Moore wrote:
On Jun 24, 2011, at 4:46 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
I've been reviewing the WGLC comments. I haven't finished doing so yet,
but so far my impression is that the discussion was both thorough and
well-organized.
You might want to go further back in the archives than just the LC. There
was quite a bit of discussion on both drafts.
I've read some of it, and participated in some of the discussion for
-advisory. Though my immediate question has been whether the WG really had
rough consensus, and I don't think the other WG discussion matters too much
in gauging that.
The question of what the wg thought at the time of the wg last call is
supposed to be captured in the document shepherd writeup.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic/history/
I belive that in the case of this documents the unresolvable but understood
objections present in the wg process around this document are specifically
called out.
Keith
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf