ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Why ask for IETF Consensus on a WG document?

2011-06-24 15:12:40
On Jun 24, 2011, at 3:57 PM, Doug Barton wrote:

By "your document" above are you referring to Brian's 
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-advisory ? If so I would 
argue that the extensive WG discussion about both documents meets your 
criteria. Taken together the 2 documents represent a series of compromises 
between those of us whose opinion is "Kill 6to4 dead, yesterday" and those 
who would like to give it as graceful an exit as possible. 

Taken together, the message is confusing. 

And for those of you whose opinion is "KIll 6to4 dead, yesterday" - that's way 
beyond the scope of what v6ops was chartered to do.

Keith

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf