ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [IPsec] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter-06.txt> (Diameter IKEv2 PSK: Pre-Shared Secret-based Support for IKEv2 Server to Diameter Server Interaction) to Proposed Standard

2011-06-02 10:27:23

Hi Yaron,
Thanks for the comments.
Please see inline [VC].

-Violeta

-----Original Message-----
From: ipsec-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org 
[mailto:ipsec-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org] On Behalf Of Yaron Sheffer
Sent: Sunday, May 22, 2011 2:38 PM
To: ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
Cc: IPsecme WG; 
draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter(_at_)tools(_dot_)ietf(_dot_)og; 
dime(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
Subject: Re: [IPsec] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter-06.txt> 
(Diameter IKEv2 PSK: Pre-Shared Secret-based Support for IKEv2 Server to 
Diameter Server Interaction) to Proposed Standard

Hi,

Having read this document only now, I think there's a number of serious issues 
with it. This document was sent to the ipsec mailing list a while ago but 
unfortunately got no review.

Summary:
1. I think the wrong architectural choice was made, in preferring PSK over EAP 
authentication.
2. There is not enough detail in the document to result in interoperable 
implementations.
[VC] Please see responses to detailed comments.

Detailed comments:
* The appropriate ref for IKEv2 is RFC 5996. This was actually noted in the 
shepherd review back in March.
[VC] This is fixed in v7.


* The document notes that EAP is one of the authentication modes supported by 
IKEv2. EAP is designed for interaction with backend AAA servers, and is quite 
capable of performing shared-secret authentication, using a variety of EAP 
methods (and see also RFC 5998, on IKEv2 mutual auth with EAP). Yet the 
document does not explain why EAP is not used, instead preferring the IKE PSK 
authentication method.
[VC] Diameter application for Diameter client to server communication for IKEv2 
with EAP has been specified in RFC 5778. However, there is no Diameter 
application specified for IKE PSK authentication method. This is stated in the 
draft both in Abstract and Introduction. The draft does not recommend one or 
the other, it is simply specifying what is not specified. It is up to a 
specific use case to decide what to use. For example 3GPP2 decided to use IKEv2 
PSK (in 2 of its specifications), and that is what triggered this effort in 
IETF.


* 4.1: how can the incoming SPI be used to identify the peer?
[VC] As stated in Section 4.1 IDi payload is extracted from the IKE_AUTH 
message and this payload 'MUST contain an identity that is meaningful
   for the Diameter infrastructure, such as a Network Access Identifier (NAI), 
since it is used by the IKEv2 Server to populate the User-Name
   AVP in the Diameter message'. SPI is not used to identify the peer.


* Packing additional semantics into SPI may conflict with elements of the IPsec 
architecture (see for example Sec. 9.3 of 
draft-ietf-ipsecme-failure-detection-08).
[VC] Agreed.


* 4.1, 2nd paragraph: generation of the PSK is central to this solution, so it 
cannot be "outside the scope" of the document. There is no way to interoperate 
otherwise.
[VC] This draft focuses on IKEv2 server, as a Diameter client, to the Diameter 
server communication for IKEv2 with pre-
   shared secret based authentication, and specifies Diameter application for 
this communication. It is left to specifications that make use of this Diameter 
application to specify where the PSK comes from and how it is generated. As 
mentioned above, there are two 3GPP2 specs that make use of this Diameter 
application and both of those specs specify generation of the PSK.


* Moreover, if a single client is expected to sometimes use EAP and sometimes 
PSK, there must be a way to notify it which one to use.
[VC] This is not the assumption. Again this draft specifies Diameter 
application for Diameter client to the Diameter server communication for IKEv2 
with PSK. IKEv2 server knows whether EAP or PSK is used.


* How does key-lifetime relate to the lifetime of the IKE SA?
[VC] This should be the same as in RFC 5996, how pre-shared secret lifetime 
relates to the lifetime of the IKE SA. This draft should not make any changes.


* Sec. 10 refers to the PSK as a "session key" which is incorrect, as PSK is 
only used for authentication and does not encrypt anything.
[VC] Good point. It is changed to PSK in v7.


* The same paragraph is very vague about the security properties of PSK.
RFC 5996 takes PSK much more seriously, e.g. "When using pre-shared keys, a 
critical consideration is how to assure the randomness of these secrets." 
Again, I believe the document should specify how the PSK is derived.
[VC] I absolutely agree that derivation of PSK is critical. However, as stated 
above, this draft specifies Diameter application only. Therefore, security 
consideration section cannot include much more details on derivation of PSK as 
it is specified elsewhere.


* Why "if nonces are included" where the document says that they *must* be 
included (in the AVP occurrence table).
[VC] Good point. This is removed in v7.


Thanks,
Yaron

On 05/20/2011 04:50 PM, The IESG wrote:
The IESG has received a request from the Diameter Maintenance and
Extensions WG (dime) to consider the following document:
- 'Diameter IKEv2 PSK: Pre-Shared Secret-based Support for IKEv2 Server
    to Diameter Server Interaction'
   <draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter-06.txt>  as a Proposed Standard

The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org mailing lists by 2011-06-03. Exceptionally, comments 
may
be sent to iesg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org instead. In either case, please retain the
beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.

Abstract


    The Internet Key Exchange protocol version 2 (IKEv2) is a component
    of the IPsec architecture and is used to perform mutual
    authentication as well as to establish and to maintain IPsec security
    associations (SAs) between the respective parties.  IKEv2 supports
    several different authentication mechanisms, such as the Extensible
    Authentication Protocol (EAP), certificates, and pre-shared secrets.

    With [RFC5778] the Diameter interworking for Mobile IPv6 between the
    Home Agent, as a Diameter client, and the Diameter server has been
    specified.  However, that specification focused on the usage of EAP
    and did not include support for pre-shared secret based
    authentication available with IKEv2.  This document specifies IKEv2
    server, as a Diameter client, to the Diameter server communication
    for IKEv2 with pre-shared secret based authentication.




The file can be obtained via
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter/

IESG discussion can be tracked via
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter/


No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.


_______________________________________________
IETF-Announce mailing list
IETF-Announce(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
_______________________________________________
IPsec mailing list
IPsec(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf