On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 12:59 PM, Dave Cridland <dave(_at_)cridland(_dot_)net>
wrote:
You were banned there because your posts were (very) off-topic, you're not
local to South Wales, and finally because we felt like it - you have no
particular right to post to SWLUG's mailing list, after all.
HTH,
Dave.
Your banning with a due process is baseless, there is not any by-laws
or rules quotation from the Swlug main document/s which should be
fixed with an unchangeable date stamp and any amendments to the main
document/s should also have an unchangeable date stamp, for example on
a Usenet public group. You and other that have banned, intimidated me
need some education on how to run mailing lists. There are no grounds
for you to ban me.
Alug (Anglian) is another linux user group today in Britain who have
joined the weasel worded racists chants by more or less banning me.
The mid to late banners have questioned my linux projects as to why I
wish to do them? When I have answered them that this is for spiritual
reasons -- they then ban me by conjuring some lies, the rabbit in the
hat trick. This is cheating and it does not give linux operating
systems a good name.
All the banners should unban me. This is racial law matter. Justice
needs to be delivered. These professional salaried / fee-earning
banners are not honest. They are cunning in their ways. I have a
huge evidence against these modern day 'journeymen' at linux user
groups in Britain and also in other areas.
While I write this for the IETF under this subject, I also wish to
complain about IETF being separate from the humanities, for example
the new domain suffix proposed by The Internet Corporation for
Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) .xxx should not be put into use as
it demeans females through pornography. Senior IETF members must
voice their concerns.
Regards
Meeku
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf