Re: HOMENET working group proposal

On Jun 30, 2011, at 1:09 AM, Martin Rex wrote:

(a bunch of stuff in defense of NAT)

Rather than having another of an endless series of discussions about the merits 
of NAT or lack thereof, can we just agree that it should not be pre-ordained 
that this WG should assume NAT as a solution?

Keith

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf