ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc2672bis-dname-22

2011-06-27 10:07:24
Thanks!

This version resolves all of my comments, with the exception that while the 
text now says the draft updates DNAME, the header still says it obsoletes RFC 
2672. Is that the intent?

Thanks!

Ben.

On Jun 24, 2011, at 10:16 AM, Scott Rose wrote:

FYI:
A new version (-23) of the dname-bis draft has been posted with the two 
sections re-added (resolver algorithm and examples of DNAME use). I haven't 
heard any comments from the DNSEXT WG on it, but it was only just posted.

Scott 

On Jun 8, 2011, at 5:50 PM, Ben Campbell wrote:

Thanks for the response! Comments below, eliding the bits I think need no 
further comment.

On Jun 8, 2011, at 12:11 PM, Scott Rose wrote:

Perhaps the document should only update RFC 2672 instead of obsoleting it?  

That would resolve my concern, if it fits with the intent of the work group.



As for the nits:


On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 6:35 PM, Ben Campbell <ben(_at_)nostrum(_dot_)com> 
wrote:  


[...]

Yes, will correct.

-- ..., 7th paragraph: "...replaced with the word "DELETED"."

Won't that just leave the word "deleted" hanging on page without 
explanation? Wouldn't it be better to just simply delete it?


Maybe, but I think the logic was that if there is some text there (just 
something), it can be cleanly referenced (i.e. "DELETED [RFCXXXX]")if 
someone is making a revised version of the RFC for some purpose.  Purely 
deleting it accomplishes the task, but this provides a good "hook" for a 
paper trail.


Okay. On reflection, it's not like we really render the updates the old RFC 
documents.


Scott
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art


===================================
Scott Rose
NIST
scott(_dot_)rose(_at_)nist(_dot_)gov
+1 301-975-8439
Google Voice: +1 571-249-3671
http://www.dnsops.gov/
===================================


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf