ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: compromise on the 6to4->Historic debate

2011-06-08 22:46:36
On Jun 8, 2011, at 11:35 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:

Have broken 6to4 relays is *good* for the long term health of the
Internet.  Applications should cope well with one address of a
multi-homed server being unreachable.  Billions of dollars have
been wasted because this has not been seen as a basic requirement
for applications.  It really isn't any harder in most cases to do
this right.

Not that I disagree with the idea that applications should be able to fail over 
from one address to another, but ... why do you assume that the server is 
multihomed?  

The problem with the broken 6to4 relay on an anycast address is that the 
application (or user, or site) doesn't get to choose a different relay.  

Keith
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>