ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-04.txt> (Request to move Connection of IPv6 Domains via IPv4 Clouds (6to4) to Historic status) to Informational RFC

2011-06-16 10:17:59
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 6:21 PM, Mark Andrews <marka(_at_)isc(_dot_)org> wrote:

... about 80% of the time.

Or 99.999% of the time once you get it setup.  The problem isn't 6to4, it's
*automatic* 6to4.


No, because you often end up being dependent on the whims of BGP and
third-party relays for your return path. Sure, if you have enough control
over routing in a closed network, you can make sure the right relays are
used. But in that case, why not use configured tunnels?


6to4 historic is throwing the baby out with the bath water.


On this we know we disagree.
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>