The discussion make it clear to me that the tasks for IANA are not clear. It
seems that there needs to be a table for each supported version of Unicode.
Thats document should state that clearly. It is a point where RFC 5892 seems
to be vague, and we should take this opportunity to remove the ambiguity.
This document or a future one needs to answer the following question:
Who is responsible for generating a new table when the next version of Unicode
comes out?
Russ
On Jun 8, 2011, at 8:32 AM, John C Klensin wrote:
(ii) The relevant ADs consider whether a document clarifying the
registry content and/or identification information is needed and
consult with IANA on that topic as appropriate. If the answer
is "yes", let's get that document posted and start debating what
changes, if any, should be made using it as a foundation (rather
than finding new weeds to drag 5892bis into).
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf